Reflecting on research challenges: Insights from Research Café 3

Posted on

By Noëlle Quénivet and Sarah-Louise Weller

On 1 July, colleagues from the College of Business and Law gathered for the third Research Café, part of a series aimed at enhancing the College’s research culture. This Research Café was designed and facilitated by Professor Carol Jarvis, who began by exploring the importance of belonging to a research community. She emphasised that research can often feel like a solitary endeavour, yet many of the challenges researchers face are shared across disciplines and career stages. The session therefore aimed to create a space for open communication about research challenges and to encourage participants to listen actively and reflectively.

Listening to challenges

The first activity focused on active listening, a skill often overlooked in busy academic environments. Participants were asked to represent a current research challenge through a drawing rather than through words. Then, working in groups of three, colleagues took turns explaining their challenges in just three minutes. One listener focused exclusively on the factual aspects of the challenge, while another listened for emotions and feelings. Each participant had the opportunity to take on all three roles. The exercise highlighted how rarely we listen with a specific purpose and how much we can learn when we pay closer attention. Also, by separating facts and feelings, participants gained new insights into their own challenges and those of their colleagues.

The discussions revealed several common themes. Time pressure emerged as a pervasive concern, as many colleagues described the difficulties of balancing research with teaching, leadership responsibilities, administration and other commitments. Participants reflected on the challenge of setting realistic research goals within constrained schedules. Many also discussed the difficulty of staying “in the zone” and protecting time for deep intellectual work. Others highlighted the challenge of balancing their enthusiasm for teaching with their passion for research, recognising that both are central aspects of academic life at UWE. Collaboration was another recurring theme. Participants reflected on the opportunities and challenges involved in working with colleagues, stakeholders and external partners, particularly when time and resources are limited. Questions of maintaining strong relationships, sustaining productive collaborations and managing expectations also featured in the conversations. The discussion also highlighted the uneven rhythms of academic research. Journal articles, funding applications and research projects often involve long periods of development followed by intense bursts of activity when deadlines, reviewer comments or funding requirements demand rapid responses.

One participant described the experience as “rinse and repeat”, returning repeatedly to similar problems because there is rarely sufficient time to pause, reflect and learn from previous experiences. In this respect, the Research Café itself became an important intervention, providing a rare opportunity for collective reflection.

Friendly consulting in action

The second half of the session introduced a process known as Friendly Consulting, a structured approach to collaborative exploration, planning and learning.

Friendly Consulting provides a framework through which participants can present a challenge they are personally responsible for addressing and receive thoughtful, reflective feedback from colleagues. Importantly, the goal is not to provide direct advice or ready-made solutions. Instead, participants are encouraged to ask questions, share observations and offer perspectives that help the challenge owner see the issue in new ways.

For the first consultation, Noëlle Quénivet and Sarah-Louise Weller presented a shared challenge: balancing their responsibilities as Directors of Research and Enterprise with maintaining their own research activity. Acting as lead consultant and facilitator, Carol Jarvis guided the conversation, interviewing the presenters and mediating interactions with the wider group. Participants contributed observations and reflections while the presenters listened and reflected on the emerging insights.

A second volunteer then presented their own research-related challenge, allowing the group to apply the process again and further develop their consulting skills.

The structured nature of the exercise created a respectful and productive environment for discussion. Participants were able to explore complex issues collectively while maintaining ownership of their individual challenges. The process demonstrated how thoughtful questioning and reflective dialogue can generate valuable new perspectives without relying on direct problem-solving.

Building a stronger research culture

As the session concluded, participants reflected on what they had gained from the afternoon. Many noted that the value of the event extended beyond receiving feedback on their own challenges. Listening to colleagues discuss their experiences provided reassurance that many research difficulties are widely shared and offered fresh ideas for addressing them.

Perhaps most importantly, the Research Café created space for reflection. By encouraging colleagues to articulate challenges, practise active listening and engage in collaborative reflection, the event contributed to the development of a more supportive and evidence-informed research culture within the College.

PS: Copilot was used to structure handwritten notes taken during this event and the final version was edited using Grammarly.

RISE Securing a green, resilient future – College of Business and Law research showcase

Posted on

After the first successful Research Showcase on the RISE Beacon ‘Enriching Culture, Place and Community’, the College of Business and Law hosted a second bringing colleagues together under UWE Bristol’s RISE Beacon ‘Securing a Green, Resilient Future’.

Opening the event, Professor Wendy Phillips, Dean of Research and Enterprise, highlighted the College’s growing role in research on climate resilience, sustainable economies, governance reform, leadership and community transformation. Emphasising the unique position and need for more interdisciplinary collaboration to address complex global challenges, Professor Phillips said:

“Securing a green, resilient future is not something any one discipline can achieve alone. As our graduates won’t work in a single context, neither should our research.”

As before, the showcase featured a series of quick-fire 5 minute presentations across two panels.


Panel 1: Reimagining systems for a green, resilient future

The first panel explored how systems: economic, legal and environmental, can be reimagined to support sustainability and resilience.

Understanding regional environmental impact

Dr Peter Bradley presented a detailed account of greenhouse gas emissions across 100 sectors in the West of England. One of the most comprehensive regional datasets to date, his work highlights both direct and embodied emissions, providing important evidence base for both policy and decision-making. For example, Professor Bradley showed how directing efforts on key sectors could have a big impact on our emissions and how zero carbon policies will not impact on jobs in the region.

Rethinking river governance

Elena Blanco invited the audience to reflect on childhood memories of rivers, paddling, fishing and connection to nature and then contrasted these with the reality of increasingly polluted waterways across the UK. Highlighting fragmented governance and under-resourced systems, she explored how a rights of nature approach could transform river management in the Bristol Avon bioregion. By recognising rivers as entities with intrinsic value rather than resources to exploit, her work positions governance as a tool for community mobilisation, bringing stakeholders together proactively to protect rivers rather than responding only after damage has occurred.

Building a circular economy through ship recycling

Dr Amore Minayora presented ship recycling as a powerful example of the circular economy. Noting that with around 140,000 ships in global circulation, many eventually reach the end of their service and must be dismantled and reused. While this system is already in operation in countries such as India, Amore highlighted both its environmental significance and its challenges, including greenhouse gas impacts and serious concerns around worker safety, regulation and practices such as beaching. Positioned at the intersection of global trade, circular economy ambitions and growing demand for greener steel, this research explores how ship recycling can be better supported and regulated to deliver safer and more sustainable outcomes.

Environmental harm and international law

Professor Gerhard Kemp explored how environmental destruction intersects with international criminal law, drawing on examples from conflict zones such as Gaza and Ukraine to illustrate the scale of damage to infrastructure and agricultural land. He questioned whether international criminal law should, and can, play a role in holding those responsible to account, noting key limitations including the lack of distinct ecocentric crimes and enforcement mechanisms. His work engages with emerging efforts to define ecocide as an international crime and introduces the concept of “terraforming warfare” as a way of understanding and framing extreme environmental destruction within existing legal frameworks.

Panel 2: Leadership, lifestyles and youth engagement for sustainable futures

The second panel focused on the human dimensions of sustainability, from leadership and behaviour change to inclusion and youth engagement.

Young people and climate action: The Think Fashion campaign

Laura McAllister shared research on sustainable consumption, highlighting how young people are often highly motivated to engage in climate action, particularly through everyday behaviours shaped by both altruistic and more individual drivers. Building on this, a HEIF-funded project brought together students, researchers and local partners to co-create the forthcoming Think Fashion campaign, encouraging more conscious consumer choices and a shift towards reducing and reusing rather than relying on recycling. With plans to develop a wider toolkit for schools, the project promotes a system wide approach, positioning consumers as active citizens who can use their purchasing power to influence change.


Making outdoor events more inclusive

Clare MacKay and Dr Ed Little presented research on the experiences of outdoor event attendees with dietary requirements, including religious, medical and lifestyle needs. Their findings show that many face anxiety, exclusion and stigma, often relying on coping strategies due to limited or unsuitable food options. The research highlights the risks of one size fits all solutions, such as assuming vegan options meet all needs, and emphasises the importance of inclusive design. By developing personas and teaching materials, their work encourages a more thoughtful approach to event planning that supports a healthier, greener and fairer society.

The Burnout Cure: A Radical Rethink of SME Leadership

Dr Alison Miles introduced her forthcoming book The Burnout Cure, which reframes sustainability through the lens of individual leadership and wellbeing. Highlighting the scale of mental health challenges among SME leaders, she described how many feel overwhelmed and uncertain, “lost in the woods” when navigating business pressures. Her work argues that sustainable change begins with the individual, showing that it is possible to run a business in a way that prioritises peace of mind over constant growth. By shifting how leaders think and act, she suggests, wider transformation across organisations and systems can follow.

Leadership beyond the Sustainable Development Goals

Professor Richard Bolden shared insights from his forthcoming edited volume The Elgar Companion to Leadership Beyond the Sustainable Development Goals, which brings together perspectives on the future of leadership in the context of global sustainability challenges. Reflecting on the need to move beyond existing frameworks, he highlighted the importance of more inclusive and system wide approaches. Drawing on a quote from humanitarian Tom Fletcher, he closed by posing a provocative question about the future of leadership in an increasingly technological world: how do we shape systems and algorithms that are more humanitarian than we are?

The next showcase will focus on the RISE Beacon of ‘harnessing creativity and technology’ date to be confirmed. For more details, contact Noelle Quenivet or Sarah-Louise Weller.

Scaling CAR-T: Bringing industry, clinicians and researchers together to expand patient access

Posted on

CAR-T therapies are transforming outcomes for some cancer patients, offering hope where few options remain. However, ensuring more people can benefit from these treatments is a growing challenge.

What is CAR-T?

Cell and gene therapies (CGTs) represent a new wave of transformative cancer treatments, delivering remarkable outcomes for patients. Among these, chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) therapies are at the forefront. CAR-T works by taking a patient’s own immune cells, modifying them in a lab to recognise and attack cancer and then returning them to the body.

These personalised treatments are designed for patients with blood cancers that no longer respond to conventional therapies. In some cases, CAR-T has delivered lasting remission where disease was once considered incurable.

The challenge of cost and complexity

However, this promise comes with significant challenges. CAR-T therapies can cost over £300,000 per patient, with additional hospitalisation costs of £1,000 to £2,000 per day.

These costs reflect the complexity of manufacturing and clinical delivery, as well as the highly personalised nature of each treatment.

This creates real pressure for publicly funded healthcare systems such as the NHS, where affordability and access remain key concerns. But cost is only part of the picture. Delivering CAR-T involves a complex pathway spanning clinical care, manufacturing, logistics and long-term monitoring, challenges that no single organisation can address alone.

The FAST CAR-T consortium

This is what the FAST CAR-T consortium aims to tackle. Funded by EPSRC and led by UCL, the project brings together researchers from Teesside University, the Royal Free Hospital London and Bristol Business School at UWE to explore barriers to CAR-T delivery and how they can be overcome.

As part of this work, the consortium runs workshops that bring together experts from across the CAR-T ecosystem. These sessions focus on shared barriers, what is needed to scale these therapies and how stakeholders can work together more effectively.

Image of breakout group discussion at the Scaling CAR-T workshop

Key insights from the workshop:

Our most recent workshop, hosted at UWE Bristol, brought together 50 participants from over 18 organisations to focus on clinical delivery, workforce and system readiness.

A clear theme was the growing complexity of the therapy landscape. While CAR-T remains central, new approaches such as tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes and regulatory T-cell therapies are expanding into solid tumours, autoimmune diseases and rare conditions.

A complex system around the patient

CAR-T delivery involves multiple stages, from patient identification and cell collection through to manufacturing, infusion and long-term follow-up. Patients may undergo weeks of treatment, including chemotherapy and extended hospital stays.

This is not just clinically complex, it also places pressure on healthcare services, from bed capacity to specialist staff and coordination across teams. As one participant put it,

“this is not a single intervention, it’s an entire system wrapped around a patient.”

The interface between clinical care and manufacturing remains a key challenge. Ensuring chain of identity and chain of custody is essential but logistically demanding, often involving multiple organisations. Limited visibility across the pathway can also make it difficult to identify and resolve issues.

Workforce and infrastructure pressures

Delivering CAR-T requires highly specialised expertise across clinical, manufacturing and pharmacy teams, yet this capability is not evenly distributed. Pharmacists are increasingly involved but may lack formal training in areas such as immunology or cell biology. As demand grows, both training and retention are becoming more challenging.

Infrastructure is another constraint. Even as manufacturing capacity increases, clinical delivery may become the limiting factor. Many centres are already working within limits, whether in bed capacity, specialist facilities or staffing.

At a system level, fragmentation also creates inefficiencies. Different digital platforms, complex contracting processes and regulatory requirements can all slow progress, highlighting the need for greater coordination and standardisation.

What needs to change?

Despite these challenges, several practical solutions emerged from the workshop. The hub-and-spoke model was widely discussed, with specialist centres delivering complex care and regional centres supporting follow-up. This could expand access without duplicating infrastructure.

Participants also highlighted the value of simple improvements such as standardised checklists, shared training and better data transparency.

Digital innovation offers further opportunities. Remote monitoring, wearable technologies and integrated data platforms could improve patient management while reducing pressure on hospitals.

There was also strong support for new hybrid roles and enhanced training pathways to address skills gaps across the system.

Looking ahead

Cell and gene therapies such as CAR-T represent the next generation of advanced medicines, with the potential to deliver more targeted and effective treatments.

However, expanding access is not just a scientific or clinical challenge, it is a systems challenge.

Without change, these therapies may only reach a small proportion of the patients who could benefit.

The next phase of the FAST CAR-T project will focus on translating these insights into practical recommendations and scalable delivery models.

As these therapies continue to evolve, so must the systems that support them. CAR-T has the potential to transform outcomes, but can healthcare and manufacturing systems keep pace and deliver equitable access for patients?

Using Generative AI for research: Insights from the CBL workshop

Posted on

On 18 February, more than 30 academics and postgraduate researchers from across BBS and BLS came together for an engaging, hands-on workshop exploring how Generative AI (GenAI) can support different stages of the research process. Hosted by Professor Noelle Quénivet and Dr Sarah-Louise Weller, the session was designed to be practical and reflective. It was suitable for colleagues at all levels of experience with GenAI, whether just beginning to experiment or already integrating these tools into everyday research practice.

The workshop set out to demystify GenAI, highlight responsible and ethical use and offer real examples of how colleagues across the College are already using AI tools to streamline their research workflows.

Understanding the landscape: what GenAI can and can’t do

The session opened with an informative presentation from Boudewijn Dominicus (Research Development Manager, Health & Science) and Lindsay McDonagh (Research Development Manager, Creative Technology). They introduced the capabilities of GenAI tools and UWE Bristol’s newly issued Guidance on Generative AI and Large Language Models in Research.

Their talk covered how large language models (LLMs) work, accuracy challenges and common pitfalls, issues around data security, ethics and environmental impact and how funders are responding. They also outlined the policies researchers need to be aware of. UWE’s policy for using AI, specifically Microsoft Copilot, was introduced alongside a clear and memorable framework for effective prompting (RISEN):

R – Role: Give Copilot a specific role
I – Instructions: Provide clear and specific instructions
S – Steps: Break complex requests into manageable steps
E – Examples: Provide examples of desired outputs when helpful
N – Notes: Add important constraints and context

They also shared several practical “pro tips”, including asking the model to rewrite your prompt for clarity, refining prompts iteratively (“multi-shot prompting”) and specifying desired output format, tone or length. They highlighted ways Copilot can support the research funding process, from aligning ideas with call scopes to structuring narratives, editing, tailoring content for different audiences and preparing for interviews.

Exploring ethical questions through scenario-based discussion

Participants then worked in groups to unpack the ethical and legal dimensions of three fictional (but very realistic) scenarios involving GenAI use in research. These discussions encouraged colleagues to reflect on confidentiality, attribution, fairness, transparency and the responsible handling of data when using AI tools.

How researchers are using GenAI right now

One of the highlights of the session was a series of demonstrations from colleagues and PGRs across CBL. Each showcased a different real-world application of GenAI in research practice.

M. Emre Hayyar: Gemini as a learned friend
Emre highlighted the importance of clearly setting boundaries in prompts. Using a powerful “kill-switch” example, he showed how the quality and accuracy of outputs can differ dramatically depending on how a prompt is constructed. His take-home message was clear: LLMs tend to be overly supportive, so ask them to be critical or to take on the role of a supervisor, reviewer or journal editor.

Dr Mike Pollard: using LLMs to build research scenarios
Mike demonstrated how an LLM can act as a research assistant when given detailed and highly specific instructions. He emphasised the importance of fact-checking and refining outputs. He also showed how to instruct the model to exclude certain sources, such as particular years, languages or jurisdictions. He highlighted the need for researchers to reshape and refine generated material themselves to ensure it meets the needs of the task.

Dr Neeti Shikha: from manuscript to conference-ready slides
Neeti shared how she uses Gamma to transform a 5,000-word manuscript into a 15-minute conference presentation. The tool helps create visually engaging, audience-appropriate slides that can be adapted for academics, students or practitioners. She also offered helpful tips for responsible use.

Alexander Grimmig: from annotation to insight
Alex demonstrated how he integrates Zotero, Obsidian and AI tools to annotate, connect and synthesise his notes on journal articles and reports. This combined workflow helps avoid fragmented notes and reduces time spent re-reading papers.

To round off the afternoon, Professor Noelle Quénivet demonstrated how she uses Copilot to draft abstracts and conclusions for journal articles, as well as composite conclusion chapters for books. She closed with an important reminder to always check your target journal’s policy on AI use and disclosure before submitting.

A collaborative and insightful session

Huge thanks go to all the presenters for generously sharing their expertise and to all attendees for their thoughtful contributions and insightful questions throughout. The workshop showed how creatively colleagues are beginning to use GenAI, while also reminding us of the care, ethics and critical thinking required to use these tools responsibly.

The strong engagement across the Business School and Law School demonstrates a genuine appetite for learning how GenAI can enhance, streamline and support high-quality research. We look forward to building on this momentum with further sessions in the months ahead.

PS: For full disclosure, Copilot was used to structure notes taken during this three-hour session and the final version was edited using Copilot.

CBL Research Café brings colleagues together

Posted on

On Wednesday 21 January, colleagues came together for the first CBL Research Café, a new space designed to connect researchers, share experiences and spark future collaborations. The session welcomed 16 colleagues (including PGR students) from across the Bristol Business School and the Bristol Law School, creating an energising and supportive environment focused on learning from one another.

Breaking the ice with Research Bingo

The café kicked off with a lively game of Research Bingo. Each participant received a 5×5 bingo card filled with academic related activities and tasks. To fill their card, colleagues had to mingle and find others who had completed each activity, encouraging plenty of conversation and cross-disciplinary interaction. The competitive spirit was high! The first four players to shout “Bingo!” walked away with a prize.

Learning from each other’s experience

The bingo didn’t stop there. Participants were then asked to identify two to three activities on their card that they hadn’t done themselves and seek out colleagues who had. These informal conversations prompted valuable discussions about how colleagues approached different research activities, the challenges they faced and practical tips others could learn from.

Mapping researcher profiles

Tetris style puzzle showing how pieces fit together and gaps.

The session then moved into a Researcher Profile Mapping exercise. Attendees ‘ticked off’ activities they had undertaken from a comprehensive list, helping to build a clearer picture of collective strengths and gaps. This exercise will enable Noelle and Sarah-Louise to identify shortfalls and shape future research development and training opportunities and provide a useful reflection for PDR discussions.

Colleagues who didn’t attend the café are welcome to complete the mapping exercise here.

Coming up next…

The feedback from this first Research Café was overwhelmingly positive, with colleagues valuing both the networking and the opportunity for reflection.

The next CBL Research Café will take place on Wednesday 4 March, 12-2pm in Room 4Q008.

Further details will be shared soon – so watch this space!

Using referencing software

Posted on

Sarah-Louise Weller and Noëlle Quénivet

Referencing is a cornerstone of academic integrity and scholarly communication. It ensures that ideas are properly attributed, supports the credibility of research and facilitates peer review. In today’s fast-paced research environment, manual referencing is time-consuming and error-prone, making referencing software indispensable.

On 19 November 2025 Sarah-Louise Weller (Director of Research and Enterprise, Bristol Business School) and Noëlle Quénivet (Director of Research and Enterprise, Bristol Law School) organised a training session for colleagues in the College of Business and Law to explore why referencing matters, the benefits of using software, and compare two leading platforms: EndNote and Zotero which were presented by Cobus Jooste and Emre Hayyar of the Law School.

Importance of referencing

Correct referencing is not just about avoiding plagiarism; it reflects professionalism and respect for intellectual property.

Researchers who fail to reference accurately risk damaging their reputations and being rejected by journals.

Moreover, referencing provides readers with a roadmap for verifying sources and exploring further readings, thereby strengthening academic discourse. From a REF perspective, supporting arguments with credible, easily verifiable evidence certainly bolsters these arguments and enhances the rigour of the output. Clear and precise citations allow for greater transparency and reproducibility in research, both of which are vital to research integrity.

Importance of using the journal referencing system

Proper referencing is essential for meeting journal guidelines, as it not only facilitates the submission process but also enhances the likelihood of a manuscript’s acceptance. While some journals use unique styles, leveraging referencing software can help manage these variations effectively.

Standardised references help the peer review process by providing clear, comprehensive information about sources. It not only helps reviewers evaluate the work on its merits but also gives the manuscript a professional appearance, suggesting it is a finished product rather than a draft. This signals that the author values accuracy and takes the writing process seriously.

Challenges of not using referencing software 

Manual referencing is error-prone and time-consuming, with risks like misspelt author names, incorrect dates and formatting mistakes. Cross-referencing footnotes manually often requires repeated checks, while switching citation styles for different journals can take hours and introduce new errors. These tasks waste valuable research time.

In contrast, referencing software automates citation and bibliography creation, allows quick style changes and integrates with word processors, saving effort and reducing mistakes.

Referencing generators v referencing managers

Referencing generators quickly create individual citations for short papers but lack long-term storage, requiring repeated entry. They mainly support styles like Harvard, APA and Chicago. Some cannot handle primary legal sources.

In contrast, referencing managers like EndNote and Zotero offer comprehensive solutions: they store and organise references, integrate with word processors, automate citation and bibliography creation, enable collaboration and sync across devices, which is ideal for large projects and consistent referencing.

EndNote and Zotero

Cobus Jooste and Emre Hayyar introduced Endnote and Zotero, two popular tools, each offering unique features.

EndNote excels in managing large libraries, supports PDF annotation and offers AI-assisted summarisation. It integrates seamlessly with Thomson Reuters journals, enabling quick imports. Users can create multiple libraries, share group libraries and switch citation styles effortlessly. With over 7,500 styles and community-driven customisation, EndNote ensures compliance with (legal) journal standards. The downside is that EndNote is paid software, which may be costly for individual researchers.

Zotero, in contrast, is free and open-source, making it accessible to everyone. It supports PDF annotation, tagging and categorisation, enabling flexible organisation. Zotero allows migration between platforms, supports footnotes and provides cloud backup options. Its intuitive interface and ability to refresh references make it ideal for collaborative and long-term projects. While it is free and user-friendly, excellent for collaboration and adaptable for various citation styles, it has limited free storage.

Practical tips for researchers

Choosing between EndNote and Zotero depends on budget, project size and collaboration needs. EndNote is suitable for large-scale, institutional projects that require advanced features and style compliance. Zotero is ideal for individual researchers or teams looking for flexibility and affordability.

Some of the tips shared by Cobus Jooste and Emre Hayyar included always backing up libraries to prevent data loss, understanding style requirements (particularly concerning primary sources in law), starting early to avoid last-minute changes, using tagging and categorisation for efficient document retrieval, and exploring tutorials and community forums for troubleshooting and advanced features.

Conclusion

Referencing software is now essential: it ensures accuracy and professionalism in research. Both EndNote and Zotero enable scholars to manage citations effectively, saving time and minimising errors. By using these tools, researchers can focus on producing high-quality work rather than struggling with formatting issues. Ultimately, the choice depends on individual needs, but adopting any referencing software is a step towards improved research practices.

Bristol Business School Hosts the South Gloucestershire Business Show 2025

Posted on

Bristol Business School was proud to host the South Gloucestershire Business Show 2025 at UWE’s Conference Centre on 19 – 20 November 2025. The two-day event brought together businesses, community partners and industry experts for discussion, networking and practical learning. The sessions focused on innovation, sustainability, leadership and regional growth.

As part of UWE Bristol’s commitment to supporting business and enterprise across the region, 16 Bristol Business School academics delivered workshops, keynote sessions and panel contributions with the aim of sharing research-informed insights directly with local organisations.

Programme Highlights

The event included a rich programme of sessions led by Business School colleagues. Across the two days, attendees engaged with topics ranging from AI and decision-making to the psychology of customer behaviour, sustainable business models, coaching-led leadership and the future of employee ownership. Workshops and talks were delivered by:

Dr Alison Miles – Rethinking success and sustainability in turbulent times

Dr Christopher Lipp – AI Orchestration for Better Business Decisions

Dr Tom Bowden-Green – Why customers do what they do

Professor Mario Vafeas and Dr Ed Little – Workplace alienation and employee ownership

Professor Mario Vafeas and Ellen Parkes – Knowledge Transfer Partnerships: Collaborating for growth

Briony Whitaker – Rethinking sustainability and the importance of context

Dr Karine Mangion-Thornley – From Manager to Coach

Professor Peter Bradley and Dr Basil Omar – Understanding business models for sustainability

Professor Carol Jarvis and Dr Kay Galpin – (Un)leadership from everywhere

Each session offered practical takeaways for SMEs and provided space for dialogue with academics actively engaged in research and practice across the fields of management, sustainability, innovation and organisational development.

Strengthening Regional Knowledge Exchange

The South Gloucestershire Business Show plays an important role in showcasing the expertise, creativity and resilience of the region’s business community. UWE Bristol was delighted to host this year’s show and to contribute to its programme through the knowledge and experience of Bristol Business School colleagues.

We look forward to continuing our partnership with the South Gloucestershire business community and supporting organisations to innovate, grow and thrive.

Africa Research Showcase: Exploring Collaboration and Innovation Across the Continent

Posted on

On Wednesday, 22 October 2025, the College of Business and Law (CBL) and the Centre for African Social and Economic Transformation (CASET) came together to host the inaugural Africa Research Showcase held at UWE Bristol’s Frenchay Campus. It was one of the events organised to celebrate Black History Month. Participants joined both in person and virtually from across the continent, including attendees based in Nigeria, Ghana, and South Africa.

Setting the Scene

“The inaugural CBL and CASET Africa Research Showcase marks a major milestone in strengthening UWE Bristol’s commitment to Africa-focused, impact-driven research,” said Professor Paschal Anosike, Director of the Centre for African Social and Economic Transformation (CASET) and Professor of Entrepreneurship and Innovation.

Opening the event, Professor Anosike stressed that,

“as the continent with the world’s largest vibrant youth population, Africa’s future depends on strong entrepreneurship and digital innovation systems – it cannot create decent jobs without them. Equally vital are accountable governance, resilient healthcare systems, and effective partnerships to realise both Agenda 2063: The Africa We Want and the UN Sustainable Development Goals. This Showcase is therefore more than an academic endeavour. It is a platform for collaboration between researchers, practitioners and students across Africa and UWE. Together, guided by our RISE framework, we aim to foster and generate evidence-based knowledge and solutions that drive inclusive growth through cross-continental dialogue and partnerships.”

A Thoughtful Discussion on Research and Impact

Presenters shared fascinating snapshots of their research around the four research areas of CASET. Each presentation reflected a commitment to understanding and addressing Africa’s complex challenges and opportunities, through innovative, collaborative and interdisciplinary research.

Panel 1: International development and digital capability:

  • Dr Lotta Takala-Greenish – Employee-Led/Practice-Based Learning: 4IR Technology in South Africa
    Dr Takala-Greenish presented a study looking at the core of economic growth and employee-led problem solving. The study found that whilst technological advancements are reshaping learning environments, their real value lies not in the tools themselves but in their strategic application within new business contexts. There is a growing focus on deep engagement and a nuanced understanding of problems, rather than simply emphasising technology. 
  • Dr Ada Peter – Digital Sovereignty and Capability: Rethinking Africa’s Dependence in the Global Cyber Order
    Dr Peter emphasised the need for control over technology, data, and standards that govern critical services and the economy. The continent’s reliance on foreign-owned networks, cloud services and undersea cables was highlighted, which creates vulnerabilities for intelligence harvesting, coercion or disruption.
  • CEO of FirstCap (Nigeria) Ukandu Eme Ukandu – Fintechs and Digitisation as Catalysts of African Entrepreneurship
    Mr Ukandu highlighted the continent’s rapidly growing, youthful population and the shift toward urbanisation and digital payments, with countries like Kenya and South Africa leading the way toward cashless economies. While e-commerce and tech start-ups are creating jobs and driving innovation, he noted that infrastructure gaps remain a key challenge to sustaining this momentum.

Panel 2: Global health and sustainability:

  • Professor Peter Case – Organisational Development for Health Systems Improvement in Africa
    Professor Case’s work focused on malaria control using participatory action research. Peter engages communities and stakeholders to co-design solutions, including task groups and visual tools like drawing to address challenges. Projects highlighted included the OPTiMIX Malaria Study in Cameroon and the LEAD Ubuntu Global Foundation, emphasising a locally driven, collaborative approach.

  • Professor Richard Bolden – Strengthening Public Healthcare Leadership in Africa (in collaboration with the University of Pretoria)
    Professor Bolden explored the challenges and opportunities for leadership, including resource constraints and corruption. He emphasised the need to reimagine leadership at a local level, drawing on African concepts such as ‘Unembeza’, a value system rooted in ethical behaviour, integrity and collective responsibility.

Panel 3: Governance and leadership:

  • Dr Luke Eda – African Union and Immunity of Heads of State under International Criminal Law
    Dr Eda began by stressing that if leaders who commit serious international crimes are not held accountable, wars and injustice are more likely to prevail, thus undermining economic and social development. His presentation offered a historical overview of the relationship between the International Criminal Court and the African Union. He pointed out that the row between the two institutions began around the issue of the immunity of Heads of State.
  • Professor Gerhard Kemp – Transitional Justice in Africa
    Professor Kemp, who also serves on the board of directors of the Institute for Justice and Reconciliation in Cape Town (South Africa),highlighted justice’s role in transforming post-conflict societies toward peace and democracy. He emphasised the importance of African-led, context-specific solutions grounded in shared values and how media coverage of major international crimes can shape perceptions of justice and support societal healing.

Panel 4: Entrepreneurship and innovation:

  • Dr Chisa Onyejekwe – Impact of Inflationary Control Measures on the Economic Rights of Women Microentrepreneurs in Nigeria
    Dr Onyejekwe’s presentation focused onthe severe inequalities that result from centrally imposed inflationary control measures on marginalised demographics such as female ‘microentrepreneurs’ in Nigeria. Her research calls for gender-sensitive, context-specific policies whose potential effects on all segments of the population are properly assessed prior to implementation.
  • Dr Tinkuma Edafioghor – Resilient Entrepreneurship: How Nigerian SMEs Innovate to Survive Uncertainty
    Dr Edafioghor asked how do SMEs survive the uncertainty of volatile markets and shifting government policies in Nigeria? What can we learn from this? Drawing on data from 150 SMEs in Lagos, she found that resilience is people-focused and social, with both employees and CEOs contributing through strong networks, supplier relationships and market insights.
  • CEO of Social Enterprise Ghana Edwin Zu-Cudjoe – Social Entrepreneurship in Africa
    Mr Zu-Cudjoe highlighted how social enterprises and innovators can drive both impact and economic transformation. He emphasised that the common myth, that you cannot do good and make money, is challenged by social enterprises, which show that positive social impact and financial sustainability can go hand in hand.

Building Bridges Across Borders and Looking Ahead

The CBL and CASET Africa Research Showcase exemplifies UWE Bristol’s ongoing commitment to equitable, globally engaged research partnerships. By bringing together diverse voices from across disciplines and geographies, this event helped strengthen the bridge between UK-based academics and African scholars and practitioners.

The success of this first Showcase has laid a strong foundation for future collaboration. Plans are already underway to host an even bigger and more ambitious event next year, further expanding the reach of CBL and CASET’s African research partnerships.

In his closing remarks, Professor Paschal Anosike reflected on the energy and engagement shared throughout the session:

“This event shows our shared commitment to building bridges across borders through equitable and globally engaged research. By connecting scholars and industry practitioners from Africa and UWE’s Africa research community, we are turning collaboration into action. We will sustain the momentum by building on this inaugural success with an international conference next year. Our ambition is to further strengthen equal and mutually beneficial partnerships that drive continuous dialogue and action with relevant stakeholders for sustainable transformation in Africa.”

Follow this blog for details of future CBL Africa Research conferences and events in 2026.

Building a Research Identity: Insights from a Collaborative Workshop

Posted on

By Sarah-Louise Weller and Noëlle Quénivet

On 15 October, a dynamic and thought-provoking workshop titled “Building a Research Identity” was hosted by Dr Sarah-Louise Weller, Director of Research and Enterprise (Business) and Professor Noëlle Quénivet, Director of Research and Enterprise (Law). The two-hour session brought together around 30 colleagues and postgraduate research students from across the College of Business and Law, keen to explore how to shape and strengthen their academic presence.

Understanding Research Identity

The session began by unpacking what a research identity is: its purpose, influence and evolution. Participants reflected on why having a clear research identity matters. A strong identity not only enhances academic impact but also supports collaboration and career progression.

Key elements of a research identity include:

  • Academic Fingerprint: Your unique combination of skills, knowledge and experiences that distinguish you from others. It reflects your expertise, preferred methods and topics of interest.
  • Public Narrative of Academic Journey: A compelling story that highlights your professional development, milestones and influences. This narrative helps communicate your growth and engages a wider audience.

  • Focus, Values, Audience and Aspirations: These define what drives your research, the questions you aim to answer, the principles that guide your work, who it is for and where you want it to lead.

  • Visibility and Credibility: A strong identity enhances recognition within the academic community and positions you as a credible, thought leader and expert in your field and among your peers.

  • Attracting Collaborators, Mentors and Funders: Clearly articulating your research identity can draw attention from potential collaborators, mentors and funding bodies to build networks that share your unique vision.

  • Career Direction and Impact: A defined research identity helps you set goals, stay aligned with your values and measure how your work contributes to your discipline and society.

Using Online Platforms to Showcase Research

The workshop then turned to practical ways of building an online research presence. Participants learned about different platforms and were directed to consider how to use them effectively.

A key distinction was made between essential platforms such as institutional profiles (e.g., on the UWE website) and global identifiers (e.g. ORCID) on the one hand and  recommended platforms to support wider engagement such as Google Scholar, LinkedIn, Academia.edu, ResearchGate or SSRN on the other. Some are useful for discovering research and staying informed, while others for showcasing publications or engaging with peers.

Among the key tips that were shared were:

  • Select your profile platforms wisely
  • Keep them up to date, post regularly
  • Connect and integrate your profiles
  • Track citation metrics
  • Publicise your profiles

Panel Discussion: Experiences and Tips

Professor James Green (Law), Dr Sarah-Louise Weller, and Professor Noëlle Quénivet shared their own experiences of managing online research profiles. They discussed the benefits and challenges of using Google Scholar, LinkedIn, Academia.edu, ResearchGate and SSRN.

Guest speakers Dr Tom Bowden-Green and Dr Jonathan Gilbert shared how they use LinkedIn, podcasts and newsletters to increase visibility and shape their research brands.

Their advice included:

  • Be intentional about how you present your work.
  • Embrace both positive and constructive feedback.
  • Support and learn from your colleagues – research identity is built within a community, not in isolation.

Reflective Exercises: Defining Your Research Identity

Participants then took part in a practical reflection exercise designed to help them define their research identity in fewer than 21 words. They were asked to:

  • Describe their research focus.
  • Explain its significance.
  • Identify what makes their approach unique.
A diagram outlining the following steps:

- One sentence, 21 words max describe your research focus

One sentence, 21 words max explain what makes it or your approach unique

- Ask your peer to Google you and discuss whether the results match your profile

- One sentence, 21 words max explain why it matters

- Share notes with a peer

While many found it challenging, the exercise encouraged clarity and focus, helping participants distil their academic interests into a concise statement. In a peer-sharing activity, colleagues looked up each other’s profiles on Google to spot differences in search results – revealing how others perceive their online presence. Many were surprised by the discrepancies between their self-view and public visibility, highlighting the importance of curating an accurate online identity.

Continuing the Conversation – join our next event…

The next training session, “Using Referencing Software”, will take place on 19 November, 13:00-14:00 in Room 3X109. All colleagues are welcome to attend, please contact Dr Sarah-Louise Weller for details.

The Women’s Work Lab and UWE Part 2

Posted on

For the last month, my team at UWE Bristol, the Stakeholder Engagement team, have had a guest with us on placement. This is part of an initiative set up by an amazing Community Interest Company called Women’s Work Lab.

Becky Ware has joined us and very quickly become a part of the team. I have seen her confidence grow, her enthusiasm spark new ideas and her creativity bring a fresh mind-set to challenges.  Here she shares her story about the power of Women’s Work Lab, and the vital support provided by many organisations, like UWE, in offering work placements.

“Being a single stay-at-home mum, it is easy to fall into a routine, and that routine becomes a comfort that is hard to break out of.

I have been out of work for just over 9 years, in that time I had a second child, and an operation on my kidney which I had to wait a few years for.

I was trying to motivate myself into job hunting, but didn’t know where to start, having had such a large career break.

I was lucky that I had a social prescriber who texted me unexpectedly one day advising about The Women’s Work Lab (WWL), I had a look at their website, and read through all the information, a 12-week programme where they help you to get back into work sounded ideal.

I applied on a Saturday and was offered a place on the course on the following Tuesday, I had a bit of apprehension, would I be any good? Am I really the type of person that they help? Am I deserving of this? But I decided that I had to give it a go, I owed myself the chance to improve my life, and that of my kids.

The Thursday of that week I went for my first day, I arrived and waited in reception with a group of other mums, all in the same position as me, none of us knowing, really, what to expect.

The WWL course was insightful and run by a wonderful lady called Sally, she had the experience to really give us all some good advice. I’m currently only halfway through the course, the experience so far has been amazing, I’ve met some wonderful mums who are in the same position as me, and I hope we keep in touch following the end of the course.

Part of the course is a four-week work placement, I was so nervous to find out where I would be going, as were the other mums, but I was delighted to find out my placement would be at the UWE.

I’m now in my job placement, working in the FBL.

The staff in the FBL have been so incredibly welcoming, and happy to spend time with me, considering I’m not a permanent member of staff, and will only be here for 4 weeks, the amount of time and help they’ve given me has been nothing short of wonderful, their support has really helped my experience and I am so excited about looking for a job and getting back to work, I’m not sure how encouraged I would have been if I didn’t have this support.

I’ve got new experiences that will help me in my job search, even something as simple as using outlook again, and getting back into work friendly habits. The confidence this placement has given me is worth its weight in gold.

I’m so thankful to everyone in both the FBL and the WWL, without them I would probably still be at home trying to figure out the best pathway for me to return to work, and still be around for my children.

I cannot recommend the WWL course highly enough, I’m looking forward to finishing the course with some more classroom work, but I will also be very sad to leave my placement, I really feel like part of the team.”

Back to top