RISE Securing a green, resilient future – College of Business and Law research showcase

Posted on

After the first successful Research Showcase on the RISE Beacon ‘Enriching Culture, Place and Community’, the College of Business and Law hosted a second bringing colleagues together under UWE Bristol’s RISE Beacon ‘Securing a Green, Resilient Future’.

Opening the event, Professor Wendy Phillips, Dean of Research and Enterprise, highlighted the College’s growing role in research on climate resilience, sustainable economies, governance reform, leadership and community transformation. Emphasising the unique position and need for more interdisciplinary collaboration to address complex global challenges, Professor Phillips said:

“Securing a green, resilient future is not something any one discipline can achieve alone. As our graduates won’t work in a single context, neither should our research.”

As before, the showcase featured a series of quick-fire 5 minute presentations across two panels.


Panel 1: Reimagining systems for a green, resilient future

The first panel explored how systems: economic, legal and environmental, can be reimagined to support sustainability and resilience.

Understanding regional environmental impact

Dr Peter Bradley presented a detailed account of greenhouse gas emissions across 100 sectors in the West of England. One of the most comprehensive regional datasets to date, his work highlights both direct and embodied emissions, providing important evidence base for both policy and decision-making. For example, Professor Bradley showed how directing efforts on key sectors could have a big impact on our emissions and how zero carbon policies will not impact on jobs in the region.

Rethinking river governance

Elena Blanco invited the audience to reflect on childhood memories of rivers, paddling, fishing and connection to nature and then contrasted these with the reality of increasingly polluted waterways across the UK. Highlighting fragmented governance and under-resourced systems, she explored how a rights of nature approach could transform river management in the Bristol Avon bioregion. By recognising rivers as entities with intrinsic value rather than resources to exploit, her work positions governance as a tool for community mobilisation, bringing stakeholders together proactively to protect rivers rather than responding only after damage has occurred.

Building a circular economy through ship recycling

Dr Amore Minayora presented ship recycling as a powerful example of the circular economy. Noting that with around 140,000 ships in global circulation, many eventually reach the end of their service and must be dismantled and reused. While this system is already in operation in countries such as India, Amore highlighted both its environmental significance and its challenges, including greenhouse gas impacts and serious concerns around worker safety, regulation and practices such as beaching. Positioned at the intersection of global trade, circular economy ambitions and growing demand for greener steel, this research explores how ship recycling can be better supported and regulated to deliver safer and more sustainable outcomes.

Environmental harm and international law

Professor Gerhard Kemp explored how environmental destruction intersects with international criminal law, drawing on examples from conflict zones such as Gaza and Ukraine to illustrate the scale of damage to infrastructure and agricultural land. He questioned whether international criminal law should, and can, play a role in holding those responsible to account, noting key limitations including the lack of distinct ecocentric crimes and enforcement mechanisms. His work engages with emerging efforts to define ecocide as an international crime and introduces the concept of “terraforming warfare” as a way of understanding and framing extreme environmental destruction within existing legal frameworks.

Panel 2: Leadership, lifestyles and youth engagement for sustainable futures

The second panel focused on the human dimensions of sustainability, from leadership and behaviour change to inclusion and youth engagement.

Young people and climate action: The Think Fashion campaign

Laura McAllister shared research on sustainable consumption, highlighting how young people are often highly motivated to engage in climate action, particularly through everyday behaviours shaped by both altruistic and more individual drivers. Building on this, a HEIF-funded project brought together students, researchers and local partners to co-create the forthcoming Think Fashion campaign, encouraging more conscious consumer choices and a shift towards reducing and reusing rather than relying on recycling. With plans to develop a wider toolkit for schools, the project promotes a system wide approach, positioning consumers as active citizens who can use their purchasing power to influence change.


Making outdoor events more inclusive

Clare MacKay and Dr Ed Little presented research on the experiences of outdoor event attendees with dietary requirements, including religious, medical and lifestyle needs. Their findings show that many face anxiety, exclusion and stigma, often relying on coping strategies due to limited or unsuitable food options. The research highlights the risks of one size fits all solutions, such as assuming vegan options meet all needs, and emphasises the importance of inclusive design. By developing personas and teaching materials, their work encourages a more thoughtful approach to event planning that supports a healthier, greener and fairer society.

The Burnout Cure: A Radical Rethink of SME Leadership

Dr Alison Miles introduced her forthcoming book The Burnout Cure, which reframes sustainability through the lens of individual leadership and wellbeing. Highlighting the scale of mental health challenges among SME leaders, she described how many feel overwhelmed and uncertain, “lost in the woods” when navigating business pressures. Her work argues that sustainable change begins with the individual, showing that it is possible to run a business in a way that prioritises peace of mind over constant growth. By shifting how leaders think and act, she suggests, wider transformation across organisations and systems can follow.

Leadership beyond the Sustainable Development Goals

Professor Richard Bolden shared insights from his forthcoming edited volume The Elgar Companion to Leadership Beyond the Sustainable Development Goals, which brings together perspectives on the future of leadership in the context of global sustainability challenges. Reflecting on the need to move beyond existing frameworks, he highlighted the importance of more inclusive and system wide approaches. Drawing on a quote from humanitarian Tom Fletcher, he closed by posing a provocative question about the future of leadership in an increasingly technological world: how do we shape systems and algorithms that are more humanitarian than we are?

The next showcase will focus on the RISE Beacon of ‘harnessing creativity and technology’ date to be confirmed. For more details, contact Noelle Quenivet or Sarah-Louise Weller.

Scaling CAR-T: Bringing industry, clinicians and researchers together to expand patient access

Posted on

CAR-T therapies are transforming outcomes for some cancer patients, offering hope where few options remain. However, ensuring more people can benefit from these treatments is a growing challenge.

What is CAR-T?

Cell and gene therapies (CGTs) represent a new wave of transformative cancer treatments, delivering remarkable outcomes for patients. Among these, chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) therapies are at the forefront. CAR-T works by taking a patient’s own immune cells, modifying them in a lab to recognise and attack cancer and then returning them to the body.

These personalised treatments are designed for patients with blood cancers that no longer respond to conventional therapies. In some cases, CAR-T has delivered lasting remission where disease was once considered incurable.

The challenge of cost and complexity

However, this promise comes with significant challenges. CAR-T therapies can cost over £300,000 per patient, with additional hospitalisation costs of £1,000 to £2,000 per day.

These costs reflect the complexity of manufacturing and clinical delivery, as well as the highly personalised nature of each treatment.

This creates real pressure for publicly funded healthcare systems such as the NHS, where affordability and access remain key concerns. But cost is only part of the picture. Delivering CAR-T involves a complex pathway spanning clinical care, manufacturing, logistics and long-term monitoring, challenges that no single organisation can address alone.

The FAST CAR-T consortium

This is what the FAST CAR-T consortium aims to tackle. Funded by EPSRC and led by UCL, the project brings together researchers from Teesside University, the Royal Free Hospital London and Bristol Business School at UWE to explore barriers to CAR-T delivery and how they can be overcome.

As part of this work, the consortium runs workshops that bring together experts from across the CAR-T ecosystem. These sessions focus on shared barriers, what is needed to scale these therapies and how stakeholders can work together more effectively.

Image of breakout group discussion at the Scaling CAR-T workshop

Key insights from the workshop:

Our most recent workshop, hosted at UWE Bristol, brought together 50 participants from over 18 organisations to focus on clinical delivery, workforce and system readiness.

A clear theme was the growing complexity of the therapy landscape. While CAR-T remains central, new approaches such as tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes and regulatory T-cell therapies are expanding into solid tumours, autoimmune diseases and rare conditions.

A complex system around the patient

CAR-T delivery involves multiple stages, from patient identification and cell collection through to manufacturing, infusion and long-term follow-up. Patients may undergo weeks of treatment, including chemotherapy and extended hospital stays.

This is not just clinically complex, it also places pressure on healthcare services, from bed capacity to specialist staff and coordination across teams. As one participant put it,

“this is not a single intervention, it’s an entire system wrapped around a patient.”

The interface between clinical care and manufacturing remains a key challenge. Ensuring chain of identity and chain of custody is essential but logistically demanding, often involving multiple organisations. Limited visibility across the pathway can also make it difficult to identify and resolve issues.

Workforce and infrastructure pressures

Delivering CAR-T requires highly specialised expertise across clinical, manufacturing and pharmacy teams, yet this capability is not evenly distributed. Pharmacists are increasingly involved but may lack formal training in areas such as immunology or cell biology. As demand grows, both training and retention are becoming more challenging.

Infrastructure is another constraint. Even as manufacturing capacity increases, clinical delivery may become the limiting factor. Many centres are already working within limits, whether in bed capacity, specialist facilities or staffing.

At a system level, fragmentation also creates inefficiencies. Different digital platforms, complex contracting processes and regulatory requirements can all slow progress, highlighting the need for greater coordination and standardisation.

What needs to change?

Despite these challenges, several practical solutions emerged from the workshop. The hub-and-spoke model was widely discussed, with specialist centres delivering complex care and regional centres supporting follow-up. This could expand access without duplicating infrastructure.

Participants also highlighted the value of simple improvements such as standardised checklists, shared training and better data transparency.

Digital innovation offers further opportunities. Remote monitoring, wearable technologies and integrated data platforms could improve patient management while reducing pressure on hospitals.

There was also strong support for new hybrid roles and enhanced training pathways to address skills gaps across the system.

Looking ahead

Cell and gene therapies such as CAR-T represent the next generation of advanced medicines, with the potential to deliver more targeted and effective treatments.

However, expanding access is not just a scientific or clinical challenge, it is a systems challenge.

Without change, these therapies may only reach a small proportion of the patients who could benefit.

The next phase of the FAST CAR-T project will focus on translating these insights into practical recommendations and scalable delivery models.

As these therapies continue to evolve, so must the systems that support them. CAR-T has the potential to transform outcomes, but can healthcare and manufacturing systems keep pace and deliver equitable access for patients?

Using Generative AI for research: Insights from the CBL workshop

Posted on

On 18 February, more than 30 academics and postgraduate researchers from across BBS and BLS came together for an engaging, hands-on workshop exploring how Generative AI (GenAI) can support different stages of the research process. Hosted by Professor Noelle Quénivet and Dr Sarah-Louise Weller, the session was designed to be practical and reflective. It was suitable for colleagues at all levels of experience with GenAI, whether just beginning to experiment or already integrating these tools into everyday research practice.

The workshop set out to demystify GenAI, highlight responsible and ethical use and offer real examples of how colleagues across the College are already using AI tools to streamline their research workflows.

Understanding the landscape: what GenAI can and can’t do

The session opened with an informative presentation from Boudewijn Dominicus (Research Development Manager, Health & Science) and Lindsay McDonagh (Research Development Manager, Creative Technology). They introduced the capabilities of GenAI tools and UWE Bristol’s newly issued Guidance on Generative AI and Large Language Models in Research.

Their talk covered how large language models (LLMs) work, accuracy challenges and common pitfalls, issues around data security, ethics and environmental impact and how funders are responding. They also outlined the policies researchers need to be aware of. UWE’s policy for using AI, specifically Microsoft Copilot, was introduced alongside a clear and memorable framework for effective prompting (RISEN):

R – Role: Give Copilot a specific role
I – Instructions: Provide clear and specific instructions
S – Steps: Break complex requests into manageable steps
E – Examples: Provide examples of desired outputs when helpful
N – Notes: Add important constraints and context

They also shared several practical “pro tips”, including asking the model to rewrite your prompt for clarity, refining prompts iteratively (“multi-shot prompting”) and specifying desired output format, tone or length. They highlighted ways Copilot can support the research funding process, from aligning ideas with call scopes to structuring narratives, editing, tailoring content for different audiences and preparing for interviews.

Exploring ethical questions through scenario-based discussion

Participants then worked in groups to unpack the ethical and legal dimensions of three fictional (but very realistic) scenarios involving GenAI use in research. These discussions encouraged colleagues to reflect on confidentiality, attribution, fairness, transparency and the responsible handling of data when using AI tools.

How researchers are using GenAI right now

One of the highlights of the session was a series of demonstrations from colleagues and PGRs across CBL. Each showcased a different real-world application of GenAI in research practice.

M. Emre Hayyar: Gemini as a learned friend
Emre highlighted the importance of clearly setting boundaries in prompts. Using a powerful “kill-switch” example, he showed how the quality and accuracy of outputs can differ dramatically depending on how a prompt is constructed. His take-home message was clear: LLMs tend to be overly supportive, so ask them to be critical or to take on the role of a supervisor, reviewer or journal editor.

Dr Mike Pollard: using LLMs to build research scenarios
Mike demonstrated how an LLM can act as a research assistant when given detailed and highly specific instructions. He emphasised the importance of fact-checking and refining outputs. He also showed how to instruct the model to exclude certain sources, such as particular years, languages or jurisdictions. He highlighted the need for researchers to reshape and refine generated material themselves to ensure it meets the needs of the task.

Dr Neeti Shikha: from manuscript to conference-ready slides
Neeti shared how she uses Gamma to transform a 5,000-word manuscript into a 15-minute conference presentation. The tool helps create visually engaging, audience-appropriate slides that can be adapted for academics, students or practitioners. She also offered helpful tips for responsible use.

Alexander Grimmig: from annotation to insight
Alex demonstrated how he integrates Zotero, Obsidian and AI tools to annotate, connect and synthesise his notes on journal articles and reports. This combined workflow helps avoid fragmented notes and reduces time spent re-reading papers.

To round off the afternoon, Professor Noelle Quénivet demonstrated how she uses Copilot to draft abstracts and conclusions for journal articles, as well as composite conclusion chapters for books. She closed with an important reminder to always check your target journal’s policy on AI use and disclosure before submitting.

A collaborative and insightful session

Huge thanks go to all the presenters for generously sharing their expertise and to all attendees for their thoughtful contributions and insightful questions throughout. The workshop showed how creatively colleagues are beginning to use GenAI, while also reminding us of the care, ethics and critical thinking required to use these tools responsibly.

The strong engagement across the Business School and Law School demonstrates a genuine appetite for learning how GenAI can enhance, streamline and support high-quality research. We look forward to building on this momentum with further sessions in the months ahead.

PS: For full disclosure, Copilot was used to structure notes taken during this three-hour session and the final version was edited using Copilot.

Using referencing software

Posted on

Sarah-Louise Weller and Noëlle Quénivet

Referencing is a cornerstone of academic integrity and scholarly communication. It ensures that ideas are properly attributed, supports the credibility of research and facilitates peer review. In today’s fast-paced research environment, manual referencing is time-consuming and error-prone, making referencing software indispensable.

On 19 November 2025 Sarah-Louise Weller (Director of Research and Enterprise, Bristol Business School) and Noëlle Quénivet (Director of Research and Enterprise, Bristol Law School) organised a training session for colleagues in the College of Business and Law to explore why referencing matters, the benefits of using software, and compare two leading platforms: EndNote and Zotero which were presented by Cobus Jooste and Emre Hayyar of the Law School.

Importance of referencing

Correct referencing is not just about avoiding plagiarism; it reflects professionalism and respect for intellectual property.

Researchers who fail to reference accurately risk damaging their reputations and being rejected by journals.

Moreover, referencing provides readers with a roadmap for verifying sources and exploring further readings, thereby strengthening academic discourse. From a REF perspective, supporting arguments with credible, easily verifiable evidence certainly bolsters these arguments and enhances the rigour of the output. Clear and precise citations allow for greater transparency and reproducibility in research, both of which are vital to research integrity.

Importance of using the journal referencing system

Proper referencing is essential for meeting journal guidelines, as it not only facilitates the submission process but also enhances the likelihood of a manuscript’s acceptance. While some journals use unique styles, leveraging referencing software can help manage these variations effectively.

Standardised references help the peer review process by providing clear, comprehensive information about sources. It not only helps reviewers evaluate the work on its merits but also gives the manuscript a professional appearance, suggesting it is a finished product rather than a draft. This signals that the author values accuracy and takes the writing process seriously.

Challenges of not using referencing software 

Manual referencing is error-prone and time-consuming, with risks like misspelt author names, incorrect dates and formatting mistakes. Cross-referencing footnotes manually often requires repeated checks, while switching citation styles for different journals can take hours and introduce new errors. These tasks waste valuable research time.

In contrast, referencing software automates citation and bibliography creation, allows quick style changes and integrates with word processors, saving effort and reducing mistakes.

Referencing generators v referencing managers

Referencing generators quickly create individual citations for short papers but lack long-term storage, requiring repeated entry. They mainly support styles like Harvard, APA and Chicago. Some cannot handle primary legal sources.

In contrast, referencing managers like EndNote and Zotero offer comprehensive solutions: they store and organise references, integrate with word processors, automate citation and bibliography creation, enable collaboration and sync across devices, which is ideal for large projects and consistent referencing.

EndNote and Zotero

Cobus Jooste and Emre Hayyar introduced Endnote and Zotero, two popular tools, each offering unique features.

EndNote excels in managing large libraries, supports PDF annotation and offers AI-assisted summarisation. It integrates seamlessly with Thomson Reuters journals, enabling quick imports. Users can create multiple libraries, share group libraries and switch citation styles effortlessly. With over 7,500 styles and community-driven customisation, EndNote ensures compliance with (legal) journal standards. The downside is that EndNote is paid software, which may be costly for individual researchers.

Zotero, in contrast, is free and open-source, making it accessible to everyone. It supports PDF annotation, tagging and categorisation, enabling flexible organisation. Zotero allows migration between platforms, supports footnotes and provides cloud backup options. Its intuitive interface and ability to refresh references make it ideal for collaborative and long-term projects. While it is free and user-friendly, excellent for collaboration and adaptable for various citation styles, it has limited free storage.

Practical tips for researchers

Choosing between EndNote and Zotero depends on budget, project size and collaboration needs. EndNote is suitable for large-scale, institutional projects that require advanced features and style compliance. Zotero is ideal for individual researchers or teams looking for flexibility and affordability.

Some of the tips shared by Cobus Jooste and Emre Hayyar included always backing up libraries to prevent data loss, understanding style requirements (particularly concerning primary sources in law), starting early to avoid last-minute changes, using tagging and categorisation for efficient document retrieval, and exploring tutorials and community forums for troubleshooting and advanced features.

Conclusion

Referencing software is now essential: it ensures accuracy and professionalism in research. Both EndNote and Zotero enable scholars to manage citations effectively, saving time and minimising errors. By using these tools, researchers can focus on producing high-quality work rather than struggling with formatting issues. Ultimately, the choice depends on individual needs, but adopting any referencing software is a step towards improved research practices.

UWE Bristol houses UK’s first on-campus aeroponic grow system for student business

Posted on

A vertical farming system, set up on Frenchay campus using aeroponic technology to grow and supply micro herbs and baby leaf plants, is the first of its kind to be located at a UK university. The system is being used by student venture Greener Greens Co, which Jamie Taylor founded as part of his Team Entrepreneurship degree.

The 40ft container farm, supplied by LettusGrow, provides 24m2 of growing area and houses a four-tiered vertical grow-bed. The growing process uses a software that automates LED lighting, temperature and water vapour. Nutrients are delivered to the plants via atomisers that spray an organic, nutrient-dense fog onto exposed roots (a technique called ‘aeroponics’).

Greener Greens’ plants are to include petit arugula, pea shoots, coriander, basil, pak choy and other small sprouting plants like micro broccoli, which take 11-30 days to reach full height. During this time, cycle pH levels, humidity and organic nutrient levels are automatically regulated.

Jamie Taylor said: “Nature is seasonal, but in this container farm we create our own climate to produce seasonal produce all year round. This is a really innovative system that uses no soil, no pesticides, with crop yields using 95 per cent less water and 99% less space compared to conventional land-based farming.”

The entrepreneur said Greener Greens’ ethos is to have a lower carbon footprint compared to other suppliers and, by providing a growth area close to the point of need, reduce food transportation miles. It is also reducing a reliance on single unit plastic by using re-usable containers to transport the plants.

Team Entrepreneurship is a degree that helps students set up a business as a team. Jamie said: “All this has only been achievable thanks to the University. Key support from UWE Bristol’s enterprise, estates, environmental and sustainability, and catering teams has been crucial in working out how to run the business and how to introduce Greener Greens produce into the university’s supply chain.”

The system is set to produce some 200kg of pea shoots per month, as this plant variety has a short grow cycle of just 12 days. Initially the vegetables will supply the University and other local customers. The enterprise then plans to set up further containers, supplying the super yacht business. “Head chefs on board need high quality produce fast so we have an opportunity to reduce carbon footprint in this industry by setting up a container in the South of France.

“Many existing suppliers to that industry use pesticides and the produce is sometimes flown over 5000 miles to Nice, which leaves a large carbon footprint.”

Greener Greens is also building a geo-temporal inventory app that will allow its customers to see what is growing in which container, so they can place orders and receive fresher produce faster. The app will also allow chefs, for the first time ever, to specify the size and shape of their salads and garnishes in-app and create bespoke garnishes.

Jamie and his Greener Greens system set up on Frenchay campus was featured in yesterday evening’s edition of the BBC’s Countryfile, available to view on iPlayer (from 29:51).

Together we make an impact

Posted on

As we are nearing the end of the challenging year of 2020, we are taking a look back at the positive ways the Faculty of Business and Law have made an impact on society. Below is a round-up of some of the top stories, successes and impactful research that has been achieved by the faculty.

Inside the black box: the public finances after coronavirus

Bristol Business School economist and Associate Professor Dr Jo Michell, alongside a colleague from the University of Greenwich, conducted a study acknowledging that the UK can afford to keep fighting Covid-19 crisis and have created an interactive tool to model the likely economic scenarios from COVID-19.

Business Schools for Good

The Chartered Association for Business Schools have launched a series entitled ‘Business Schools for Good’. It features Bristol Business School’s collaboration with Bristol City Robins Foundation. Students on the programme, Sports Business and Entrepreneurship, talk about the course and the sense of community they gain from undertaking IT. It is a great example of the work we do with a key faculty partner.

Business successes

A group of 40 entrepreneurs that we trained through our partnership with ChangeSchool and Mowgli Mentoring in February 2020, have gone on to secure £2.4m in sales and funding and are now seeing their businesses go from strength to strength.

AI software could help construction industry achieve net zero target

Bristol Business School’s Big Data Laboratory is leading an £800,00 project to develop software that uses artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning to help construction companies reduce the amount of embodied carbon in their building and infrastructure projects. It is a two-year project and is in collaboration with Winvic Construction, Castain and start-up company Edgetrix.

CIMA award wins

The department of Accounting, Economics and Finance have won two Charted Institute of Management Accountants (CIMA) Excellence awards; the CIMA Prize-Winner Excellence award and the CIMA Global Excellence award. These awards celebrate university partners with outstanding students, pass rate and excellence in the CIMA exams and the highest number of CIMA students on campus.

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

Bristol Leadership and Change Centre’s Professor Peter Case has secured a grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to assist the Ministry of Health & Child Care in Zimbabwe to improve HIV prevention. The project is in collaboration with the Malaria Elimination Initiative at the University of California and will run until December 2022. The overall aim is to integrate prevention services and move them forward in a more sustainable way. Further details of the project are available on UWE Bristol Leadership & Change Centre blog.

SAGE Prize for Innovation and Excellence 2020

Dr Jenna Pandeli won the SAGE Prize for Innovation and Excellence 2020 for her co-authored paper ‘ Captive Cycles of Invisibility? Prisoners’ Work for the Private Sector.’ The article critiques a case of modern prison-labour by exploring prisoners’ attitudes towards the prison-work they undertake while incarcerated and received the award due to its innovation – excellence in the field.

Systems Leadership Development in Public Health

Professor Richard Bolden and Professor Carol Jarvis (alongside an interdisciplinary team) conducted a review of systems leadership development in public health. The aim of the project, which was funded by Public Health England, was to inform the development of public health registrars and consultants in the UK. The insights support the capacity of public health leaders to respond to public health crises such as Covid-19.

Faculty Professional Service Team

The Professional Service Team in the faculty is a small but close group who have not only been incredibly flexible in taking on different duties this year but also genuinely look out and support one another and the Faculty community. We are so proud of this team and all they have achieved this year. We couldn’t do it without you!

Post-Occupancy Research Report

Dr Harriet Shortt, Dr Svetlana Cicmil and Dr Hugo Gaggiotti published their Post-Occupancy Research on Bristol Business School. The report captures how users feel about the building and how it used, all through one of the largest qualitative visual field studies in the field of Organisational Studies. The project was funded by Stride Treglown and ISG.

Combating Malaria in Namibia

Professor Peter Case’s research focus has expanded to Namibia during 2020. Three recent Zimbabwean graduates from our Postgraduate Certificate in Professional Practice in Change Leadership programme have worked on the project with Namibia’s Vector-borne Diseases Control Programme to combat malaria by improving frontline prevention and treatment of the disease in Kavango Province.

Criminal Justice Natters

Dr Ed Johnson from Bristol Law School has a podcast series called Criminal Justice Natters. His research interests centre on criminal justice and procedure; in particular, he has an interest in the law of disclosure, fair trial rights and adversarialism. In the series, he talks to people such as Chris Daw Q.C. about his bestselling book Justice on Trial and Liam Allan, who was wrongly arrested 2016.

Virtual Christmas Tree fundraiser

During December we have been fundraising for Shelter with our BBS | BLS virtual Christmas tree. You can see the running total and donate here and write a message on our tree here.

Challenging male dominance through the substantive representation of women: the case of an online women’s mentoring platform

Posted on

A new research article that analyses ‘alta‘ an online mentoring platform for women in aviation has been published by Susan Durbin, Professor in Human Resource Management at UWE Bristol, Stella Warren, Research Associate in the Bristol Leadership and Change Centre at UWE Bristol and Ana Lopes, Lecturer in Human Resource Management at Newcastle University (UK).

Susan Durbin is also a board member of the European Sociological Association’s Research Network 14, Gender Relations in the Labour Market and the Welfare State. Her research fields are women working in male dominated professions and gendered careers.

Stella Warren has a background in applied social research. Her research topics include social marketing and the understanding of psychological pathways for behaviour change in health; gender and inequality in organisations; the gender pay gap; and women working in male-dominated industries.

This article analyses the design of an online mentoring platform—for women by women—in a high‐technology, male‐dominated UK industry: aviation and aerospace. Based on interviews with professionals and managers, they analyse the journey of the women involved and contribute to the understanding of the role of women (individually and collectively) in challenging gendered norms in a male‐dominated industry through the theoretical lenses of ‘critical actors’ and ‘critical mass’. They combine these concepts, usually seen as mutually exclusive, to explain the success of the online platform. This shows how a small number of self‐selected critical actors represented, listened and responded to the needs of the women in their industry, thus achieving the substantive representation of women. They also argue that while critical actors were key to its inception, the mentoring platform now needs a critical mass of women to ensure its success. You can read the article in full online.

Find out more about alta in their recent case study about the importance of mentoring platforms, especially relating to the corona-virus pandemic. Stella Warren also took part in our Future Impact Webinar series to talk about supporting women in male-dominated industries which you can listen back to online.

A Toolkit for Living in a New Building: a visual post-occupancy evaluation of Bristol Business School

Posted on

How does a new university building change the behaviours of the people who work and study there? Today marks the launch of the report A toolkit for living in a new building: A visual post-occupancy evaluation of Bristol Business School’, the culmination of a ground-breaking two-year collaborative study between architect, Stride Treglown, construction partner, ISG and researchers from the University of the West of England. Using participant photography, Instagram and image-led discussion groups as a data generating methodology, the report details the value of taking a sensory approach to the post-occupancy evaluation (POE) of new buildings.

Going way beyond more usual ‘technical-functional’ analyses of how new buildings operate, our report provides an in-depth, user-centred account of how the transparent, collaborative, flexible and open building affects working and studying practices. It ends with a set of future-focused recommendations and value propositions for stakeholders involved in commissioning new university accommodation.  Using innovative visual methods including Instagram, participant-led and participant-directed photography, alongside image-led discussion groups, data was collected over a full year cycle with over 250 participants contributing to the study; 30% staff, 60% students and 10% visitors. Building users were asked to submit photographs and captions of their spatial experiences in the building that addressed two questions:

How do you feel about the building?

How are you using the building?

Only 10% of our findings replicate areas covered by traditional POE, suggesting there is great utility in employing more qualitative approaches to deep dive into the value offered by contemporary campus architecture. Instead, social and psychological topics including health and wellbeing, the rhythms of food, drink and sensory experiences, reflections on identity and belonging, unexpected delights and the ‘wow’ of the building set against the reality of working in transparent and visible ways are presented alongside captivating images from the project.

Given the current Covid-19 crisis, the Bristol Business School building is currently closed – as are most university premises – and the lessons we are learning about ourselves as we work under ‘lockdown’ conditions might have implications for how generative buildings are designed in future: e.g. blending physical presence with digital connectivity more extensively. Even though this research was completed before Covid-19, there are valuable lessons in this report. Attending to the sociability of work and study in different spaces, and the psychology of location-independent working may prove to be especially significant as we navigate through the current pandemic.

The full report can be downloaded from www.myuwebbsview.com

Home-working during COVID-19

Posted on
Harriet Shortt

Harriet Shortt is Associate Professor of Organisation Studies at The University of the West of England, Bristol. Harriet’s research focuses on organisational space, artefacts, the materiality of work, and visual methodologies. Her research has been published in journals including Human Relations, Organizational Research Methods, Management Learning, Visual Studies and the International Journal of Work, Organisation and Emotion. Harriet has led research projects in both public and private sector organisations, such as the Environment Agency, the NHS, Stride Treglown Architects, and ISG Construction. This is a guest blog from Harriet. 

We are all currently experiencing a situation we have never been in before where society has had to change and adapt beyond recognition, and one of the biggest changes we have had to make is the one associated with our work spaces. Many of us are now working at home and this has meant a complete shift in where we work and left some wondering how to cope with these changes. I have been asked to put together this blog with some thoughts and reflections for those people who have found themselves unexpectedly working from home.

Before we think about space, it’s worth thinking about work more broadly first. I have seen the use of the word ‘productivity’ floating about a lot recently. Be cautious of using this word (and this goes for employers/organisations/team leaders as well as us as individuals!). Whether it’s to ‘prove’ you are being productive at work or being productive in other ways – like taking up a new hobby or learning a language or suddenly taking up running – we need to remember we are in the middle of a pandemic and we are not out of it yet. Trying to set never-ending targets for how you are going to self-improve and working to unrealistic expectations is not good for your mental health or work – it is known as ‘toxic productivity’ and we need to recognise when this creeps into our working lives. Productivity does not look the same as it did before Covid-19, so adjust your goals, your boundaries, and your breaks from work to reflect this challenging period of time.

Let’s now turn our attention to home spaces. Our homes have now become a complex shared space. It’s an office, a gym, a place to relax and for many of us, a classroom. This can make it hard to find a ‘dedicated workspace’ that also encompasses everyone else’s needs in your household. Even for those who are used to working from home, this will be a new challenge as the routine of perhaps working at home alone will have likely changed and you’ll be sharing your ‘work’ space with others. This is going to require negotiation and open conversation about how, where and when we work with a house full of people. Be mindful that everyone’s boundaries have been broken and need to be re-established carefully.

Finally, it’s worth reminding ourselves that this is going to take time. We have all been dumped into this situation and working from home is more complicated than just finding a dedicated workspace, so don’t expect to get it right straight away. Try working in a particular space and if it doesn’t work, that’s ok – try somewhere else. Some work activities may work well in some home spaces, and others will need alternative spaces, so don’t feel you need to stick to the same place every day.

So, some thoughts on creating and thinking about our ‘new’ home-working spaces:

Free up different spaces for different tasks

This might mean adapting or re-appropriating your home spaces at different times of the day, for example, currently my dining room is a classroom by day and a family area at the weekends. I often take work calls in the kitchen or the garden so I can keep an eye on daughter, but my work that needs concentration is done is quieter spaces.

Think about your space creatively

Could you use liminal spaces (these are spaces ‘in-between’, like landings, hallways, stairways) in your house as a make-shift office, a place to take private calls, or as a place to find a few moments of quiet and reflection? I recently wrote a blog for Work Wise UK that explores this very topic and how the liminal spaces of our homes can provide some important and unexpected uses whilst we’re working at home during this crisis.

‘Own’ your space

Wherever you do choose to work from, make sure you make it yours, even if this is just temporary. Research shows that the more you are able to have a sense of ownership over your workspace and create a sense of identity, the more positively it will impact your sense of wellbeing and connection to your work.   

Re-claim your ‘normal’ spaces

If you are having to appropriate a ‘normal’ space (like a kitchen table) into a workspace, try to turn it back to a ‘normal’ space at the end of the day. This might help you to manage the boundaries between work and home, and with your sense of work/life balance.

Visual communication tools and ‘being on show’

For many people, technology has enabled them to make this transition to working from home easier. However, this still comes with its own problems. It has been clear since the majority of UK businesses have adopted remote working, that being ‘visible’ and ‘on show’ in our home spaces has brought many advantages and disadvantages. So, it’s worth reflecting on some of these issues as an individual or as an employer; having your camera on for meetings is a great way to connect socially with your colleagues and the backdrop of your home can be a conversation starter! Lots of people have been commenting on the backgrounds of their colleagues’ homes, the pets that accompany the meetings or even the children that might make a brief appearance. Having spoken to a lot of people about home working spaces over the past few weeks, there is a real sense that this has made us all more ‘human’. Seeing inside other people’s homes has made them more ‘real’ and people have enjoyed seeing this informal/ private side, rather than the typical traditional/formal interactions we are used to in the office. It is this that has brought people together.

Nonetheless, let’s be conscious of privacy and visibility when using these audio/visual communication tools. Others I have spoken to feel they are inviting people into their home spaces that perhaps they would not choose to. The blurring of the work/home boundary has been emphasised by our current use of technology. So, be respectful of asking colleagues to turn on their videos during meetings – there is a case of being social and connecting, but there is also a case for privacy and managing boundaries so that we keep some of the sanctuary of our homes to ourselves.

Capturing this experience in photographs

Apart from workspaces, my other area of research involves visual research to explore the everyday lives of workers. I use an approach called ‘participant-led photography’ and this includes asking people I work with in my research projects to take photographs based on a brief e.g. ‘what work spaces are important to you and why?’ and then they talk to me about their images. This method elicits rich stories from participants and gives them the opportunity to talk about what is meaningful to them at work. Over the past 8 weeks for so I have seen so many images being shared on social media that picture what its really like to work at home. Social media platforms are a rich source of data at the moment and images captured and posted by workers all over the world depict the complexities, the joys, the difficulties and the juggles of working from home. I think this could be a great opportunity for organisations and employers to do their own visual research:

  • Organisations can collect data about the complexities of employees working remotely. Ask your team to take pictures of what it’s like working at home, where are they, how are they sharing their workspaces, what do they enjoy and what are they finding difficult. This could be a creative way of engaging your team, but also getting feedback. Remote working is here to stay in some form, so the more information and data we have about how people are doing it and how they experience it, the better.
  • During the current crisis, these images could be part of weekly catch ups and individual conversations with your line manager or be part of a PDR session. Or, they could be collectively posted on a virtual team noticeboard and discussed as a group. Either way, it might help people to reflect and share, and for organisations to sense-check how their employees are coping with working from home.
  • Post Covid-19, these images could also help us learn from this experience, as part of our recovery – teams or organisations could hold an exhibition of people’s images that document what working from home looked like for them. We will, at some point, need to come together to reflect and heal from this experience and a good way to do that might be through the eyes of employees and their photographs.

If you would like more information or to get in touch please email bbec@uwe.ac.uk.

Future Impact Webinar: Supporting women in male-dominated industries

Posted on

You can now watch the recording of the latest of our Future Impact Webinars on the topic of supporting women in male-dominated industries.

In this webinar our main speaker is Stella Warren, Research Fellow at Bristol Leadership and Change Centre, who gave a detailed presentation around this topic and set the context behind the issues faced by women working in a male-dominated industry.

Our other two panellists are founding members of alta (an online mentoring platform to support women in aviation) Judith Milne, Specialist Aviation Executive and Ros Azouzi, Head of Careers at the Royal Aeronautical Society (RAeS).

The webinar gave way to some positive discussion about this subject and we were able to answer several audience questions live.

To view our previous webinars in the Future Impact Webinar series visit our website and to view the most recent webinar head to the recording here.

Back to top