Student Publication Success: Research with Young Children

Posted on

Dr Tim Clark, Tim.Clark@uwe.ac.uk and Rita Buehring.

In this blog post we learn from, and about, Rita Buehring, a 2022 graduate from our BA (Hons) Early Childhood programme. Rita recently had a paper based on her undergraduate dissertation research at UWE accepted for online publication by the national Early Childhood Studies Degree Network (ECSDN). Her paper, titled ‘Outdoor Voices: Children’s Perceptions of the Natural World’ is available here. She also returned to UWE to present her work to our current Early Childhood undergraduates.   

The Early Childhood programme Rita studied at UWE places a significant focus on reflecting on children’s place in society and the importance of listening to the voices of young children. Students have opportunities to consider the significance of participatory approaches to research, most notably including the Mosaic Approach (Clark, 2017) and are required to engage with debates regarding the complex ethical and methodological nature of research in this area. This was reflected in Rita’s work, which her reviewers suggested was a ‘great piece of writing’ addressing ‘important ideas’.

Rita’s success also reflects the ongoing work of our Education and Childhood Research Group (ECRG), which seeks to support students and early career researchers to gain experience of publication and also to highlight the importance of research which privileges children’s voices (link to strand). For example, within the School of Education and Childhood, we also have a current project which will support 14 UWE doctoral graduates to publish their work as part of an edited collection of chapters (Waller, Andrews & Clark, forthcoming, 2024) and an upcoming early career researcher seminar for staff and postgraduate students. Meanwhile a collaborative research team, led Dr Sarah Chicken at UWE has been successful in securing just under £700k funding from the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), for a three-year project focusing on children’s participation rights.  

I spoke to Rita about her experiences at UWE and her recent work:

Q: Could you tell us a bit about yourself?

My name is Rita Buehring. I am currently residing in the UK however my background is a mixture of Kenyan, German and Swiss. I am 25 years old. I enjoy writing and performing poetry, running, fundraising and most importantly, travelling!  I completed the BA (Hons) Early Childhood at UWE. This course inspired me to pursue a master’s degree in the field of educational psychology, so that I can further contribute to global ways of learning and teaching for both children and adults.

Q: How would you describe your experience of studying at UWE?

UWE has and will always feel like home to me! I enjoyed the multi-cultural environment, the various opportunities to socialise and meet new people on and off campus, the easily accessible facilities and the supportiveness of peers. Also, certainly not forgetting the dedication and passion of lecturers to ensure each student progresses on their academic journey. In summary, my experience at UWE was very enjoyable despite being disrupted by the Covid pandemic.

Q: What was your dissertation study about, and how did you approach it?

I chose to focus my dissertation on understanding children’s attitudes of and experiences in the natural world because of my passion for, and immerse curiosity about, the outdoors. With this in mind, I decided that a forest school would be the ideal setting to undertake my study in order to obtain a rich insight into children’s views on the outdoor environment. There, I met an inspirational Forest School leader who introduced me to new resources and ways of thinking about education in the outdoors. In conjunction with my regular meetings with my dissertation supervisor, this encouraged me to develop criticality and reflexivity whilst conducting my research project. I ensured children were always put in the forefront of the project whenever I could, as this is consistent with my personal values.

Q: Why do you think listening to children’s voices in research is important?

A lot of research focuses on improving children’s lives, however I think children’s voices are often ignored within important discussion – even though there is no better way to find out more about someone than asking them directly! I believe children have opinions which should be taken seriously, as they are fundamentally the experts on their own lives. Involving them in research empowers them to exercise their rights as individuals.

Q: Why did you decide to submit your paper for publication on the ECSDN site?

Essentially, I think the amount of research that includes the voices of children on their outdoor experiences is limited. Publishing my paper for ECSDN created one more opportunity for children’s opinions to be heard on such an important topic.

Q: What was your first experience of writing for publication like?

I was very nervous at first. However, with the support of my personal tutor, family, and friends, I found the process quite enjoyable. It created an opportunity to challenge and improve my academic writing skills. I also received quite detailed feedback from the ECSDN team, which guided me on how to transform my first draft into material suitable for publication.

Q: Do you have any tips or advice for current Early Childhood students – or for anyone considering studying Early Childhood on the future?

DO IT! Studying early childhood has had a profound impact on my understanding of my own life and experiences and those of others. I no longer take everything at face value. Instead, I try to dissect meaning and behaviour as part of the deeper foundations that are built and influenced by various social contexts. I would advise any new students to approach this degree with an open mind. Be prepared to be challenged and impacted by the placements you will undertake and in your seminars with peers.

Rita’s paper can be found on the ECSDN website: ECSDN Journal Volume 1 Final (mcusercontent.com)

Further information about our BA (Hons) Early Childhood Programme can be found here: https://courses.uwe.ac.uk/X312/early-childhood

Further information our ECRG can be found here: https://www.uwe.ac.uk/research/centres-and-groups/education-childhood-research

References

Clark, A. (2017). Listening to young children, expanded third edition: A guide to understanding and using the mosaic approach. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

Waller, R., Andrews, J. & Clark, T. (eds) (forthcoming, 2024) Critical Perspectives on Educational Policies and Professional Identities: Learning from doctoral studies Emerald Publishing

‘It’s our job to take the limits away’: A case study approach to exploring culture of teacher expectations in an English secondary school

Posted on

Education Research from UWE reaches around the globe…

In this article, Dr Smith draws on her doctoral research, carried out in the Department of Education and Childhood at UWE, investigating the beliefs and practices of high expectation teachers.

Although Dr Smith’s EdD thesis was only submitted recently, it has already had global reach. One of her supervisors, Dr Richard Waller received an unexpected email from a researcher at the New Zealand Council for Educational Research who wrote to say how impressed he was with the quality of Dr Smith’s research.

Having only had my thesis revisions accepted in June, I am still somewhat in a haze and only just beginning to reflect on my doctoral journey. I began my professional doctorate in education with a keen interest in extending my understanding and in improving practice: I wanted to generate professional knowledge that would have real impact. Achieving that goal was without doubt a challenging, but incredibly rewarding and enriching experience.

My professional interest in my research project was born from a sense of social injustice. Having taught in the state sector for over twenty years, I have been increasingly troubled by the concept of labelling and notions of fixed abilities that are prevalent in our education system. From the earliest stages of formal education, teachers are required to make predictions about future development of the children based on present attainment, as well as determining students’ academic ability. Children from lower socio-economic groups and from particular minority ethnic groups are over-represented in lower sets and streams, and allocation to these groups does not always match the level of ‘ability’ as designated by test scores. As children progress through school, attainment gaps widen between children from lower socio-economic groups and their peers, suggesting that schooling exacerbates inequalities in educational attainment.

This sense of injustice led me to explore the beliefs of ‘high expectation teachers’, and the practices through which teachers aim to build an inclusive learning environment, in addition to the ways they develop strategies that do not rely on pre-determined ability labelling. This exploration led me to understand that what constitutes a ‘high expectation’ teacher needed to be investigated from particular locations: through government policy; through theoretical models; through professional regulation and performance management, and through notions of professional identity. I learnt that these positions sometimes overlap, but at times, also conflict with one another.

The case study design of my research is focussed on one phenomenon, that of the beliefs and practices of high expectation teachers, and one bounded case illustrates the phenomenon. The case is specific, and bounded by time and location. It is intended to emphasize uniqueness through the in-depth exploration of the participants’ experiences. Within this bounded system are the relationships between people and events, and within those are differing perspectives, as the positions on what makes a ‘high expectation’ teacher are contradictory, and not universally agreed.

I used thematic analysis to analyse data collected through questionnaires, interviews and focus groups, but reflected that despite the in-depth nature of this analysis, the phenomena of high teacher expectation remained only partially scrutinised in terms of social justice. Therefore, the social concerns raised throughout my study are also explored through the theories of Bourdieu with the aim of making sense of the wider issues of inequality inherent in this study, particularly in the sense that habitus is helped by, and helps shape, pedagogical action.

My findings are that there needs to be a recognition that in education, socially advantaged interests and voices dominate in terms of social mobility agendas. Social cohesion is therefore a challenge as inequality rises from an education system tailored to white, middle-class values, and until we value the diversity of heritage in all its forms, we cannot hope for greater equity for our students. Furthermore, teachers tend to be granted space in the public domain only through technical competency. Findings also suggest that teachers must be able to be emotionally committed to different aspects of their jobs, as their sense of moral responsibility is at the core of their professional identity.

The research also challenges the assumption that academic achievement is paramount and suggests that there are many other measures of success, in which students discover and are celebrated for a particular talent, or a passion for something new. The ability to make choices should be a fundamental right and should be accessible to all as a result of social justice.

This presents a challenge in today’s economic and political climate. At the time of writing the thesis, 4.1 million children in the UK are living in poverty, a rise of 500,000 in the last five years, and in-work poverty has been rising even faster than unemployment, driven almost entirely by increasing poverty among working parents. In addition to the economic context our young people are living in, educational policy increases social inequities rather than reducing the poverty attainment gap. For example, additional funding has been allocated for new grammar school places, despite evidence that dividing children into the most ‘able’ and the rest from an early age does not appear to lead to better results for either group, including for the most disadvantaged students.

The financial landscape for most schools paints a bleaker picture than that for grammar schools. A further significant challenge for the education sector is the recruitment of the required number of teachers of sufficient quality and motivation, at a time of continued public pay restraint and rising student numbers. Similarly, spending on early education, Sure Start and the childcare element of Working Tax Credit fell by 21% from 2009–10 and 2012–13, with falls of 11% for early education, 29% for targeted support for childcare and 32% for Sure Start. Child Tax Credit and Child Benefit payments were frozen in financial terms. In addition to cuts to income support, community-based support services and to the funding of voluntary groups and services, this financial context may have an impact on children as they enter the school system.

Furthermore, Britain’s high-status professions remain dominated by the privileged; those from traditionally working-class backgrounds earn on average £6,800 less than colleagues from professional and managerial backgrounds. Although students in my study feel that they can ‘get ahead’ on merit, it could be suggested that British society is profoundly unfair. Education is crucial to change, but it cannot be considered in isolation if we are going to tackle the challenge of disadvantage. Education must be freed from its current constraints so that educators have the opportunity to develop every child’s personality, talents and abilities to the full.

Within the constraints of this wider context, one recommendation that arose from the study with the aim of creating a culture of high expectations is that a form of ‘high-integrity’ setting could be implemented in schools. In practice, strategies such as: making setting as subject-specific as possible; grouping students by attainment rather than perceived effort; regularly testing and moving students between sets, and using a lottery system when assigning borderline students to sets may help mitigate the consequences of attainment grouping. Schools, however, may be deterred from implementing more equitable grouping practices by perceptions of middle-class parental and student preferences for attainment grouping. A further complication raised in this study is that most teachers who currently teach in attainment groupings believe that mixed attainment groupings would create further barriers to progress.

A final reflection for me is on the complex and problematic nature of the barriers to creating a culture of high expectation. I entered into this research project with a rather idealistic notion that exploring one definition of high-expectation beliefs and teaching practices could lead to the creation of a culture of high expectation. The reality is far messier. In addition to my exploration of the contradictory definitions of what makes a ‘high expectation’ teacher, research discourse related to teachers tends to be prescriptive, rather than serious study of, or collaboration with, those prescribed to or portrayed. This resonates with my own professional experience, and I am grateful to have had the opportunity to explore this complex phenomenon through several lenses, even though at times these lenses seemed somewhat elusive!

Dr. Julie Smith has recently completed her doctoral research into the beliefs and practices of high expectation teachers, in the Department of Education and Childhood under the supervision of Dr. Richard Waller, Dr. Nicola Bowden-Clissold and Dr. Sarah Chicken. She is also Vice-Principal at a secondary school in Gloucestershire.

Follow Dr Julie Smith on twitter

References:

Archer, L., Francis, B., Miller, S., Taylor, B., Tereshchenko, A., Mazenod, A., Pepper, D. and Travers, M. C. (2018) The symbolic violence of setting: A Bourdieusian analysis of mixed methods data on secondary school students’ views about setting. British Educational Research Journal. 44 (1), pp. 119–40.

Barnard, H., Collingwood, A., Leese, D., Wenham, A., Drake, D, Smith, E. and Kumar, A (2018) UK Poverty 2018 [online].York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation. Available from: https://www.jrf.org.uk/report/uk-poverty-2018 [Accessed 25 April 2019].

Blandford, S. (2018) Born To Fail? Social Mobility: A Working Class View. Suffolk: John Catt.

Bourdieu, P. (1973). Cultural Reproduction and Social Reproduction. In:R. Brown, ed., (1973) Knowledge, Education, and Cultural Change: Papers in the Sociology of Education. London: Tavistock, pp. 71–112.

Bourdieu, P. (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1984) Distinction.London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Bourdieu, P. (1990) The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1991) Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1992) The purpose of reflexive sociology. In Bourdieu, P. and Wacquant, L., eds., (1992) An Introduction to Reflexive Sociology.Cambridge: Polity Press, pp.61–217.

Bourdieu, P. (2002) Habitus. In: Hiller, J. and Rooksby, E., eds., (2002) Habitus: A Sense of Place. Farnham: Ashgate, pp.27–34.Bourdieu, P. and Passeron, J. C. (1977) Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture. London: Sage.

Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 3 (2), pp. 77–101.

Clifton, J., and Cook, W. (2012). A long division: Closing the attainment gap in England’s secondary schools. London: IPPR.

De Boer, H., Timmermans, A. C. and P. C. van der Werf, M (2018) The effects of teacher expectation interventions on teachers’ expectations and student achievement: narrative review and meta-analysis. Educational Research and Evaluation. 24 (3-5), pp. 180-200.

Francis, B., Taylor, B., Hodgen, J., Tereshchenko, A. and Archer, L. (2018). Dos and don’ts of attainment grouping. London: UCL Institute of Education.

Friedman, S. and Savage, M. (2017) The Shifting Politics of Inequality and the Class Ceiling. Renewal.25 (2), pp. 31–40.

Gorard, S. and Siddiqui, N. (2016) Grammar Schools in England: a new approach to analysing their intake and outcomes. Project report. Durham: Durham University.

Harrison, N. and Waller, R. (2017) Success and Impact in Widening Participation Policy: What Works and How Do We Know? Higher Education Policy.30 (2), pp. 141–160.

Hart, S., Annabelle, D., Drummond, M. J. and McIntyre, D. (2004) Learning Without Limits. Berkshire: OUP.

Jussim, L. and Harber, K. (2005) Teacher Expectations and Self-Fulfilling Prophecies: Knowns and Unknowns, Resolved and Unresolved Controversies. Personality and Social Psychology Review. 9 (2), pp.131–55.

Lupton, R., Burchardt, T., Fitzgerald, A., Hills, A., McKnight, A., Obolenskaya, P. Stewart, K., Thomson, S., Tunstall, R. and Vizard, P. (2015) The Coalition’s Social Policy Record: Policy, Spending and Outcomes 2010-2015. Social Policy in a Cold Climate Report 4 [online]. Manchester: University of Manchester; London School of Economics and the University of York. Available from http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/spcc/rr04.pdf [Accessed 27 May 2019].

Nias, J. (1989). Primary teachers talking: A study of teaching as work. London: Routledge.

Rosenthal, R. and Jacobson, L. (1968) Pygmalion in the Classroom: teacher expectation and pupil’s intellectual development.New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Rubie-Davies, C. (2015) Becoming A High Expectation Teacher: Raising The Bar.Abingdon: Routledge.

Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 443-466). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

UNCRC (1990) The United Nation Convention on the Rights of the Child [online]. UK: Unicef.Available from: https://www.unicef.org.uk/what-we-do/un-convention-child-rights/ [Accessed 23 October 2017].

Back to top

Follow this blog

Get every new post delivered right to your inbox.