Thinking about death for the future

Posted on

By Dr Verity Jones, Associate Professor in Education

Recently, much of my thinking, particularly in collaboration with Chris Bear (Cardiff University), has led me to think more deeply about death as an ecological, educational and ethical concept that demands a futures lens. In our work on food systems, we ask what it would mean to attend to the deaths of non-human animals and plants –  not as abstractions but as lived relations.

In February, I attended the Centre for Sociodigital Futures, Immersive Public Futures Symposium, where themes of loss, endings, disappearance and possibility threaded through discussions of how societies imagine, design and negotiate futures.

International perspectives on imagining futures

Contributions from international speakers underscored that futures – thinking is rarely a smooth trajectory of progress.

  • Fabio Rubio Scarano (Federal University of Rio de Janeiro/Museum of Tomorrow) foregrounded planetary change and regeneration through anticipating and paying attention both to memory and tomorrow.
  • Lisa Bailey (Museum of Discovery, University of South Australia) explored how museums can engage diverse publics with complex and uncertain futures.
  • Andrea Bandelli (Woven Foundation for Creative Climate Communication) challenged us to recognise immersion not as a technical medium but as a condition – a relational mode that shapes how we encounter the world and its potential futures and agencies.
  • Mandy Rose (UWE Bristol) discussed documentary and digital cultures as tools for imagining post‑carbon possibilities through planty immersion.
  • Justin McGuirk (Design Museum, London) examined design-led approaches to futures and the need to construct possible future buildings to imagine within.
  • Dan Lockton (Norwich University of the Arts) reflected on how lost futures can help people collaboratively reimagine alternative futures.
  • Johannes Stripple (Lund University) used speculative ecology and storying  to unsettle fixed narratives of crisis and change.

Across these contributions, there was an insistence that imagining futures requires attending to what is disappearing, threatened or already lost.

Connections

The symposium strongly resonated with work with my own research. Whether supporting young women in imagining near-future careers in construction and engineering, examining ecological timescales in food ethics, or analysing how children’s literature either narrows or expands temporal imagination, much of my work is centrally concerned with how learners inhabit and negotiate time.

This sits alongside collaborations with colleagues at the Global Goals Centre and SPARKS Bristol, where we co-create learning experiences that are research‑informed, inclusive, socially engaged and committed to widening imaginative possibility.

Looking ahead

The symposium has sharpened my thinking on how endings and futures coexist – and how education must hold both. Several publications drawing on this work, including research on identity making, children’s literature and sustainable education, are currently in preparation and will be shared later this year.

Why geography teacher educator conferences matter: Reflections from Manchester

Posted on

By Dr Verity Jones, Associate Professor in Education

The annual Geography Teacher Educator Conference took place in Manchester this year. At a time when teachers, teacher educators and researchers are navigating curriculum change, intensifying accountability pressures and the urgent challenges of climate and environmental crisis, conferences like this feel more important than ever. They offer not only a space for sharing research, but also a vital community of practice where ideas, uncertainties and hopes can be held collectively.

Conferences as spaces of knowledge exchange and care

The Geography Teacher Educator conference was awash with the generosity of exchange. Geography teacher education sits at a productive intersection between academic research, classroom practice and policy, and this was reflected in the diversity of sessions and conversations. Delegates moved fluidly between theory and practice: discussing curriculum futures, teacher identity, disciplinary knowledge, and pedagogical approaches to sustainability and environmental justice.

Equally important was the sense of support. Informal conversations over coffee were as valuable as formal presentations, offering space to share challenges, test ideas and reconnect with a community that understands the particular pressures of working in and with schools. In a sector where workloads are high and opportunities for reflective dialogue can be limited, these conferences act as moments of pause, renewal and collective thinking.

Schools under the microscope: Interdisciplinary inquiry with children

I was fortunate to present two interdisciplinary projects during the conference. The first was Schools under the microscope, a collaborative project (with Dr Ben Williams and Dr Margarida Sardo, UWE Bristol) that brings together geography, science, creative methods and children’s literature to explore how young people understand and experience their school environments.

Central to this project is our new children’s book, developed as both a research output and a pedagogical resource (with a launch coming soon!). The book invites children to look closely at microfibres. Sharing this work with geography teacher educators prompted rich discussion about the role of narrative, creativity and interdisciplinary approaches in supporting meaningful environmental learning.

The Hear Soil Project

My second input to the conference was a co-presentation with Amanda Bailey (Bath Spa University) focused on the Hear Soil Project. Hear Soil uses sound, sensory engagement and creative inquiry to foreground soil as a living, relational and often invisible element of geographical education.

Presenting this work within a geography teacher education context generated thoughtful conversations about how we might move beyond extractive or purely scientific framings of soil, towards pedagogies that emphasise care, reciprocity and more-than-human relationships. These discussions reinforced the value of collaborative, cross-institutional projects in opening up new ways of thinking about disciplinary knowledge.

Looking ahead

Leaving Manchester, I was reminded that conferences like this are not simply about dissemination. They are about connection, care and collective imagination. For those of us working in education and childhood research, they provide the conditions for interdisciplinary ideas to take root, for early-stage projects to be nurtured, and for shared commitments to social and environmental justice to be renewed.

As we look ahead to upcoming project launches and continued collaborations, the conversations begun at this conference will continue to shape both research and practice – a reminder of why these spaces matter.

Back to top

Follow this blog

Get every new post delivered right to your inbox.