Empowering Change Across Borders: The HR, Work and Employment (HRWE) Group’s International Women’s Day Celebrations

ripleywk | 26 March 202526 March 2025

By Chathushka Kiriella, Tinkuma Edafioghor, Vanda Papafilippou and Susan Durbin

The last couple of weeks have been an incredibly busy and productive time for for HRWE group members as we celebrated International Women’s Day with a series of inspiring events. We wanted to share what we have been doing to Inspire Inclusion and Accelerate Action, the theme of this year’s International Women’s Day and one that resonates with us all as we continue to address gender inequalities and to celebrate women’s achievements and actions.

The celebrations began within the University with a ‘pledge campaign’ where we asked staff and students to commit to how they would promote gender equality and to reaffirm their commitment to fostering gender inclusivity. Midweek, we hosted an international women’s day celebration event featuring powerful speeches from influential leaders, highlighting the importance of diversity in the workplace. Our activities then turned externally to an event in London, hosted by the Royal Aeronautical Society’s Women in Aviation, Aerospace and Space Committee, highlighted and honouring the achievements of women in the industry; and a further event in Paris, France, hosted by the Royal Aeronautical Society’s Paris Branch, where we engaged with more incredible women from the aviation sector, sharing experiences and discussing ways to drive inclusive change. These events provided an excellent platform for networking, learning, and celebrating progress toward gender equality. In this blog, we will take a closer look at each event, sharing key moments and takeaways from this inspiring celebration.

Vanda standing with Andrew Simpson ''Together we can forge Woman's Equality''

To celebrate International Women’s Day, Dr. Vanda Papafilippou and Ms. Chathushka Kiriella organised an interactive event aimed at promoting gender equality and inclusivity within the College of Business and Law (CBL) and wider University of the West of England (UWE Bristol) community. Staff and students participated by adding their personal pledges for gender equality to notice boards in the Atrium area. Organising such an event was crucial for several reasons: it made International Women’s Day more relevant by actively engaging staff and students, prompting them to reflect on their own experiences and the importance of gender equality in their personal and professional lives, and creating a space for open discussions about gender equality. By gathering pledges, the event provided tangible evidence of our community’s commitment to gender equality, which will inform future actions and initiatives, including our Athena SWAN application.

Many pledges emphasised the importance of supporting gender equality in all areas: workplace, home, and community, highlighting that “the future is dependent on the continued development of gender equality” and that “women should not feel their gender is a barrier to work or education”. Staff and students expressed their commitment to empowering and supporting women and trans women in their personal and professional lives, saying “I pledge to support all women in work and home life,” “I pledge to continue to promote gender equality in my life and my teaching”. Recognising and celebrating women’s achievements was also a key theme, highlighted by pledges such as “I pledge to make time to celebrate all women’s achievements”. Many pledges also called for active advocacy and taking action to promote gender equality with commitments like “I pledge to raise my voice,” “speak more about it encourage more open talks” and “I pledge to support our amazing UWE female students advocating for themselves and stand up when facing any sort of injustice or devaluing behaviour”. Finally, a great number of participants focused on the need for “equal pay, promotion, career opportunities for everyone” pledging to mentor colleagues and enabling them to reach their full potential.

Midweek on March 5th, HRWE group members gathered to celebrate International Women’s Day (IWD) in their own unique style at Bristol Business School, UWE. A ‘grand potluck’ was organized, featuring a themed cake. The event began with a welcome speech by Chathushka Kiriella, who emphasized the importance of accelerating action—both in the workplace and in personal life. Whether big or small, committing to action was a key takeaway from her speech. The group lead, Professor Susan Durbin, then addressed the gathering, highlighting the significance of celebrating women and their contributions.

The event featured three inspiring talks by Dr. Vanda Papafilippou, Dr. Tinkuma Edafioghor, and Dr. Stefano Gasparri. Dr. Papafilippou discussed UWE Bristol Business School’s application for the Athena Swan award and shared key insights into gender equality initiatives at UWE Bristol. Dr. Edafioghor shared her personal experience with the 100 Black Professors Scheme, highlighting the invaluable support she had received as a mentee. Her speech was deeply inspiring and underscored the importance of strong support networks for women. Dr. Gasparri spoke about the crucial role men must play in shifting from bystanders to “man-allies” in protecting women from sexual harassment, sharing key findings from his recent research. The event was filled with inspiration, empowerment, and a strong sense of community.

The IWD celebrations then expanded to London, where Professor. Susan Durbin, Dr. Tinkuma Edafioghor, and Ms Chathushka Kiriella attended the International Women’s Day event organized by the women in Aviation, Aerospace and Space Committee, Royal Aeronautical Society, London. The event featured inspiring talks by women leaders, panel discussions, and networking sessions. The event was opened by Christine Matthews, WAASC Chair, with a welcome speech from Sameer Savani, GKN, who sponsored the event. Speakers included, Celia Pelaz, COO and Theresa Condor, CEO At Spire Global. There was also a panel event on ‘Voices of the Future” with Maleha Khan, UK Space Agency, Alice Goodwin, Virgin Atlantic and Janine Hornsby, CEO – Air League. The keynote speech was delivered by Former Boeing VP Pam Valdez, who shared the incredible journey of Hedy Lamarr as an inventor—an inspiring story to hear on International Women’s Day. The day rounded off with Professor Susan Durbin presenting on ‘women’s safety at work’ with Kathleen Lowe, COO, Force Air Defence and Judith Milne, Little Blue Private Jets Limited. The importance of mentoring in this highly male-dominated sector was a theme throughout the day, the alta mentoring platform being highlited and promoted by the UWE team.

The final event, sponsored by the University of the West of England and run in parallel with the London event, was the Royal Aeronauticial Society’s Paris Branch IWD event, on 11^th March, 2025. The event was base upon an expert panel of six women leaders from the aviation industry, with a focus on actions to improve gender diversity and inclusion and advice from panel members’ experiences of what does and does not work to achieve this. The panel, moderated by Carine Petitdemange, Logix Aero, comprised Yannick Assouad, Thales, Judith Milne, Eastwinds Resort, Anne-Segolene Abscheidt, IPSA, Ann-Marie Matheus Ochoa, Eutelsat and Space women Alliance, Claire Barcham, UK Space Agency and Professor Susan Durbin, UWE. The event was opened by the Branch Chair (David Cooke) and an introduction by Dr Susanne Svensdotter.

The panel discussed key challenges, including the decline in STEM participation due to educational reforms in France and the importance of fostering interest in STEM from an early age, with parents playing a key role. Panellists emphasised the importance of creating supportive communities, promoting mentorship, and addressing barriers such as visa restrictions and language challenges for international female talents. They critiqued superficial diversity policies, advocating for meaningful cultural change, inclusive language, and environments where women succeed on merit, not quotas. Reverse mentorship was suggested to challenge traditional perspectives, and the importance of diverse career paths beyond engineering — such as HR and data analysis — was highlighted. Intersectionality and microaggressions were acknowledged as significant hurdles for women from diverse backgrounds, with advice to leverage networks and speak out against inappropriate behaviours. David Cooke closed the event with a powerful statement: “The future of humanity is in the hands of women,” leaving attendees inspired to drive lasting change in the industry.

UWE Comets Cheerleading team posing ''Together we can forge Woman's equality''

The past few weeks of International Women’s Day celebrations have been a testament to the power of collective action in promoting gender equality and inclusivity. From pledge campaigns and interactive discussions to thought-provoking speeches and global networking events, the HRWE group has played a pivotal role in fostering dialogue and inspiring change. The celebrations in Bristol, London, and Paris have provided valuable platforms for sharing experiences, advocating for systemic progress, and emphasizing the importance of mentorship and community support. As we reflect on these impactful events, it is clear that the journey toward gender equality requires continuous effort, collaboration, and commitment. By championing these conversations and supporting one another, we can continue to break barriers and create a more inclusive future for all.

Exploring Neurodiversity in Engineering: A Video Series by Vanda Papafilippou and Lucy Downes

ripleywk | 23 April 202423 April 2024

Vanda Papafilippou and Lucy Downes, have recently published a series of videos exploring their findings around their research on neurodiversity in engineering. They have made these videos so that the information from their research is free and accessible, publishing the information on YouTube for all to access. More information on each video can be found below as well as a brief bio of each author.

Introducing the study.

The first video in the series, Introducing the study neurodiversity in engineering, introduces a study conducted by Dr. Vanda Papafilippou (Principal Investigator) and Miss Lucy Downes (co-Investigator). The study, carried out in 2023, focused on the experience of neurodivergent engineers in the workplace.

Getting in.

91% of survey respondents found that there were barriers in the recruitment process for neurodivergent people. The second video, Neurodiversity in Engineering: Getting in, addresses the topic of recruitment and selection. What parts of the recruitment process pose the biggest barriers – what works well? The video looks at what organisations can do to remove barriers from the selection process, and what Neurodivergent people look for when applying for a new role.

Moving on.

The third video, Neurodiversity in Engineering: Moving on, presents the main findings of the research on neurodiversity in engineering, focusing on the experience of neurodivergent engineers once in the workplace. What are challenges both physical and social that they face and how HR processes and the questions of ‘’disclosure’’ can have an impact.

Moving up.

Part four of the series, Neurodiversity in Engineering: Moving up, explores the findings related to career development and progression, and how this interacts with neurodiversity in engineering. How lack or role models and certain role requirements not inline with the skill set such as people management created barriers to progression in the workplace.

Implications for practice.

Finally, the last video in the series, Neurodiversity in engineering: Implications for practice, discusses the implications of the research findings for smaller teams, line managers, senior managers, HR policies and practices, and organizational culture more broadly.

About the Authors

Dr. Vanda Papafilippou is a Senior Lecturer in Human Resources Management at the University of the West of England (UWE Bristol), specializing in Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI) in the workplace. Her research focuses on addressing gender inequality, improving diversity management practices, and promoting inclusive recruitment, as evidenced by her leadership on projects exploring women’s networks, the experiences of European expatriates, and neurodiversity in engineering. Combining her academic expertise in qualitative research methods with her active engagement with industry, Vanda has developed and delivered inclusive recruitment and selection training for organizations, created EDI training materials for social enterprises, and served as a judge for the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development’s Applied Research Conference, making her a prolific researcher and practitioner dedicated to fostering more equitable and inclusive workplaces.

Lucy Downes, a Lecturer in Human Resource Management at UWE Bristol. She has achieved Fellow status with the Higher Education Academy and is close to completing the Post Graduate Certificate in Academic Practice. Lucy’s research interests centre on equality, diversity, and inclusion in the workplace. As part of her dissertation, she explored the social factors that support or hinder the professional identities of senior female aerospace engineers. Since joining UWE Bristol, she has worked on a research project investigating the experiences of international students during the COVID-19 pandemic.

She has also collaborated with an interdisciplinary team on a Higher Education Innovation Fund-supported project to develop a framework to help engineering organizations recruit and retain neurodiverse employees.

Exploring the experience of neurodivergent engineers in the workplace: Re-crafting engineering?

ripleywk | 17 April 20235 April 2023

Dr Vanda Papafilippou & Miss Lucy Downes

The neurodiversity paradigm views neurodiversity as natural variations in human cognition that should be equally valued and celebrated (Chapman, 2022) thus challenging earlier research (and practice) that tended to take a deficit perspective and referred to ADHD, Autism, Dyslexia, Dyscalculia, etc. as disorders that needed to be ‘treated’ (Chapman and Bovell, 2022). Nevertheless, despite the increased awareness of the strengths of neurodivergent thinking and the value that diverse perspectives can bring to organizations (Kirby and Smith, 2021), neurodivergent people may experience discrimination and marginalization once disclosing to their employer (Baldridge and Swift, 2013; Johnson and Joshi, 2017). What is more, to date there is limited research that explores the perspectives of neurodivergent employees to gain an understanding of contextual factors that might create barriers in the workplace (Doyle and McDowall, 2021) but also about how neurodivergent people approach work in general.

This blog entry looks at neurodiversity from both an academic/research and practitioner perspective, offering some practical future directions for employers. We are specifically focusing on an aspect of our findings: how neurodivergent engineers engage in job crafting. In order to do so, we draw upon Lazazzara et al.’s (2020) job crafting process model which considers the job crafting motives, the impact of context, the forms of job crafting, personal factors and the job crafting consequences.

Our exploratory study focused on how neurodivergent engineers (all sectors, including software) experience the entire employee lifecycle (i.e., recruitment, career development and progression). We chose to focus on engineering as, anecdotally, there are many neurodivergent individuals in the profession as neurominority thinking strengths align to engineering skills, such as creative thinking and attention to detail (Engineering Council, 2022; Loiacono and Ren, 2018).

Background

Wrzesniewski and Dutton (2001) noted that the need for control over work, establishing a positive self-image and connections with others motivate to engage in job crafting, which, in its turn, is argued to enhance the person-career fit (De Vos et al., 2020) and stimulate employees’ career growth (Hall and Las Heras, 2010). Employees may be proactively and/or reactively motivated to craft their jobs and that the form of job crafting depends also on contextual factors, such as organisational climate and job design components (e.g., resources, workload, demands) (Lazazzara et al., 2020).

However, to date there are no studies on how neurodivergent employees might engage in job crafting. An important gap considering that neurodiverse employees are often excluded and marginalised in the workplace due to negative stereotyping (Den Houting, 2019; Patton, 2019; Priscott and Allen, 2021) and negative organisational cultures (Kapp et al., 2019; Saleh et al., 2022) and this might impact their self-confidence, relationships with colleagues and control over work (Booth, 2016; Sheppard et al., 2016). Taking into consideration that there is little research on neurodiversity and employment (Doyle and MacDowall, 2021) this gap becomes even more pertinent. Therefore, we asked:

What processes can be identified that illustrate when and how neurodiverse engineers engage in job crafting?

How do contextual factors (i.e., organisational climate and job design) influence neurodiverse engineers to engage in job crafting?

This was a qualitative study drawing upon in-depth semi-structured interviews. We interviewed 35 engineers (i.e., chemical, mechanical, aerospace, civil, software, oil & gas), male (24) and female (11), mostly of White British, one White Australian and 2 from ethnic minority backgrounds (British Asian, British Black). Participants were mainly employed (i.e., in large and smaller organisation) apart from two who were self-employed/ contractors. The participants were recruited using purposive sampling and access was sought via personal contacts, social media (Facebook groups, Twitter, LinkedIn), support from large Engineering organisations (HR and Employee Resource Groups), the Engineering Council, and snowballing. The interview schedule was developed following guidance from Norris et al. (2020) to acknowledge the challenges that autistic participants in particular might encounter. Towards this end we have also included semantic prompting (i.e., a general prompt before asking for a specific instance) and visual prompting.

Findings

To analyse our findings, we drew upon Lazazzara et al.’s (2020) job crafting process model which considers the job crafting motives, the impact of context (supportive vs. constraining), the forms of job crafting (i.e., approach job crafting, avoidance crafting and crafting in other domains), personal factors (supportive vs. constraining) and the job crafting consequences.

The engineers in our sample seemed to engage in job crafting mostly reactively (e.g., because of pressure to behave as ‘engineers’ and work following a specific pattern) but also proactively (e.g., shape their careers/roles according to their strengths, use some strategies in order to improve their performance), depending on how supportive their organisational context was. However, most of them, and especially those in larger organisations, appeared to be experiencing constraints not only due to the organisational context (e.g., negative stereotyping, lack of support from HR and especially their line managers) but also professional standards (e.g., they struggled to ‘fit the box’ of being a chartered engineer). In some cases, line managers ruled out progression opportunities based on the stereotypical assumption that neurodiverse individuals lack the social skills needed to manage a team. The forms of job crafting that are emerging so far are: approach crafting (e.g., adding tasks they enjoyed doing more of, establishing different ways of managing their teams), avoidance crafting (e.g., avoiding networking or socialising, avoiding for going for certain promotions) but also crafting in other domains (e.g., adjusting their working hours when working remotely, changing their physical environment, etc.).

Practical Implications

Our findings can provide a set of practical implications for Engineering as a sector and organisations. Given the current skills shortage of engineers (Armitage et al., 2020), it is of crucial importance that the sector adapts its practices to ensure that it attracts, recruits, and retains neurodiverse engineers through building a genuinely inclusive professional culture which is also reflected on the criteria for chartership (i.e., being less prescriptive). The key learnings for HR are:

Commitment to an inclusive workplace culture

Organisations need to move away from deficit thinking around neurodiversity and work towards a more positive and inclusive culture which in its turn, will provide a supportive context for job crafting and most importantly enhance the sense of organisational and professional belonging.

Retention of talent: revisiting job descriptions career progression criteria

Organisations need to carefully reconsider job design (e.g., Do all engineers need to approach the problem in the same way? What skills and experience are essential?) and ensure that they offer autonomy in carrying out job activities (but also support when neurodiverse employees might struggle with their work-life balance).

Performance management

All line managers should be trained in how to manage, support, and review the progress of neurodiverse employees. HR could also evaluate performance management, using a neurodiversity lens, and identify which encouraged behaviours (e.g., being ‘diplomatic’) or practices (e.g.., networking) might impede career progression and/or influence what considered ‘good performance’.

References

Armitage, L., Bourne, M., Di Simone, J., Jones, A. and Neave, S. (2020). Engineering UK 2020: Educational pathways into engineering. EngineeringUK.

Baldridge, D.C. and Swift, M.L. (2013) Withholding requests for disability accommodation: The role of individual differences and disability attributes. Journal of Management. 39 (3), pp.743-762.

Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Stott, C., Bolton, P. and Goodyer, I. (1997) Is there a link between engineering and autism?. Autism. 1 (1), pp.101-109.

Booth, J. (2016) Autism equality in the workplace: Removing barriers and challenging discrimination. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

Chapman, R. (2020) Defining neurodiversity for research and practice. In Chapman, R., ed. (2020) Neurodiversity Studies. London: Routledge, pp. 218-220.

Chapman, R. and Bovell, V. (2022) Neurodiversity, advocacy, anti-therapy. In Matson, J. and Sturmey, P. (2022) Handbook of Autism and Pervasive Developmental Disorder. Springer, Cham, pp. 1519-1536.

Costello, E., Kilbride, S., Milne, Z., Clarke, P., Yilmaz, M. and MacMahon, S.T. (2021) September. A Professional Career with Autism: Findings from a Literature Review in the Software Engineering Domain. In European Conference on Software Process Improvement. Springer, Cham.

De Vos, A., Van der Heijden, B. I. J. M. and Akkermans, J. (2020). Sustainable careers: Towards a conceptual model. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 117: 103196, pp. 1-13.

Den Houting, J. (2019). Neurodiversity: An insider’s perspective. Autism. 23 (2), pp. 271-273.

Doyle, N. and McDowall, A. (2021) Diamond in the rough? An “empty review” of research into “neurodiversity” and a road map for developing the inclusion agenda. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal. 41 (3), pp.352-382.

Engineering Council (2022) Neurodiversity Celebration Week. Available from: Engineering Council (engc.org.uk) [Accessed 4 January 2023].

Hall, D. T. and Las Heras, M. (2010) Reintegrating job design and career theory: Creating not just good jobs but smart jobs. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 31, pp. 448–462.

Johnson T, D. and Joshi, A. (2016) Dark clouds or silver linings? A stigma threat perspective on the implications of an autism diagnosis for workplace well-being. Journal of Applied Psychology. 101 (3), pp. 430–449.

Kapp, S.K., Steward, R., Crane, L., Elliott, D., Elphick, C., Pellicano, E. and Russell, G. (2019) People should be allowed to do what they like: Autistic adults’ views and experiences of stimming. Autism. 23 (7), pp.1782-1792.

Kirby, A. and Smith, T. (2021) Neurodiversity at work: Drive innovation, performance and productivity with a neurodiverse workforce. London: Kogan Page Publishers.

Lazazzara, A., Tims, M. and de Gennara, D. (2020) The process of reinventing a job: A meta–synthesis of qualitative job crafting research. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 116: 103267, pp.1-18.

Loiacono, E.T. and Ren, H. (2018) Building a Neurodiverse High-tech Workforce. MIS Quarterly Executive. 17 (4), pp.263-279.

Norris, J. E., Crane, L. and Maras, K. (2020) Interviewing autistic adults: Adaptations to support recall in police, employment, and healthcare interviews. Autism. 24 (6), pp. 1506–1520.

Patton, E. (2019) Autism, attributions and accommodations: Overcoming barriers and integrating a neurodiverse workforce. Personnel Review. 48 (4), pp.915-934.

Priscott, T. and Allen, R.A. (2021) Human capital neurodiversity: an examination of stereotype threat anticipation. Employee Relations: The International Journal. 43 (5), pp. 1067-1082.

Saleh, M.C., Chang, H.Y., Bruyère, S.M. and Vogus, T.J. (2022) Employment Selection Methods and Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder. In: Bruyère, S.M. and Colella, A. eds., (2022) Neurodiversity in the Workplace: Interests, Issues, and Opportunities. New York: Routledge.

Sheppard, E., Pillai, D., Wong, G.T.L., Ropar, D. and Mitchell, P. (2016) How easy is it to read the minds of people with autism spectrum disorder?. Journal of autism and developmental disorders. 46 (4), pp.1247-1254.

Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2001) Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. The Academy of Management Review. 26 (2), pp. 179–201.

Tag: Vanda papafilippou