By Danielle Sinnett, Miriam Ricci, Janet Ige, Hannah Hickman, Adam Sheppard and Nick Croft (UWE), Michael Chang (PHE), Julia Thrift and Tim Emery (TCPA)
The Getting Research Into Practice 2 (GRIP2) project was commissioned by Public Health (PHE) England and delivered in collaboration with the Town and Country Planning Association. The project had two aims:
- To facilitate the implementation of health evidence set out in key PHE publications by directly engaging with local and regional policy makers, and practitioners across place-making professions and communities.
- To provide evidence-informed resources to assist local authorities in developing planning policies to improve health and wellbeing.
Following the publication of Spatial Planning for Health in 2017, PHE commissioned a further research project: Getting Research into Practice (GRIP). This sought to explore the use of the principles set out in Spatial Planning for Health, and the challenges of applying these in local planning policy and decision making. The findings informed the basis of this second phase of Getting Research into Practice (GRIP2).
What we did
We selected four locations to take part in the research and develop local resources from 39 Expressions of Interest. Workshops were then held in each of the selected locations, below, to understand how health evidence could be used in the development of planning policies, with a different focus:
- Worcestershire: template Technical Research Paper on Planning for Ageing Well that could form the evidence base for new Supplementary Planning Documents (SPD).
- Hull: template SPD on Healthy Places to address the considerable health inequalities.
- North Yorkshire, York and East Riding (YNYER): framework for planning for health.
- Gloucestershire: template to integrate health into neighbourhood plans.
The four workshops took place in November 2019 and each was attended by approximately 30 key representatives from across planning and public health, the relevant local authorities or county councils, and locally identified stakeholders. Workshops consisted of a series of short ‘scene setting’ presentations followed by short interactive workshops.
Written notes from workshop discussions and other background documentation from the local areas were then analysed using the qualitative data analysis software NVivo.
The notes and analysis were used to develop:
- A national guidance document: Getting Research into Practice: a resource for local authorities on planning healthier places
- Four detailed guides showing how to find and use health evidence to create specific planning resources:
Key findings and recommendations
We found that across the four locations examined there is a genuine recognition of the ongoing need to develop places that improve health and wellbeing outcomes and reduce health inequalities. However, integration and partnership working across the professions is key, and there are areas of good practice where this is already taking place. It was seen as crucial that all those involved in the planning and development process understand the importance of planning in tackling poor health and health inequalities, including central and local government planning policymakers, and those working in development management, private developers and their consultants.
Despite this, barriers remain related to a lack of leadership, experience, financial resources and capacity in local authorities. Participants were positive that these barriers could be overcome through, for example, increasing communication and joint working between planning and public health teams, learning from best practices and successes in other locations, making better use of the powers available to planners and including a wider range of voices and contributions in the local planning policy process.
There is also an opportunity to make more effective use of health evidence in local planning policy by improving stakeholders’ understanding of the types and sources of available evidence and their strengths and limitations.
The effective use of health evidence in practice, in turn, can further strengthen the case for healthy places at the local level, encouraging buy in from politicians and local communities.
The use of workshops was seen as a key engagement mechanism that helped to initiate and strengthen these local appetites for better integration.
The research report provides a series of recommendations, for example:
- Tailored local evidence with specific objectives and audiences in mind could be provided to allow planning policies and decisions to be made more effectively and robustly.
- All stakeholders could develop a shared understanding of the role of planning in improving population health and reducing health inequalities.
- Make best use of public health evidence, including that generated by communities, to help planners use their powers more effectively.
- Ensure that health inequalities, and their relationship with the built environment, are well understood and explained in planning policies.
- Support the creation of an effective evidence base which can be applied within a planning context, including through monitoring and evaluation of planning policies.
The resources provided above provide detailed guidance towards achieving some of these recommendations and are a valuable resource for planning and public health teams.