By Jacqui Warner, Environmental Management MSc student
Below Jacqui shares her dissertation proposal to investigate microfibres with a laundrette:
Most people never consider the fabric of their clothes, the composition of the fibres (Liu et al., 2021), their environmental fate or whether they may unintentionally ingest or inhale fragments of their garments. In 2011, Browne et al., linked microplastics being washed onto riverbanks to microfibres released during clothes laundering, and for the first time, identifying the role of washing machine effluent arriving at wastewater treatment plants. Since then, a plethora of research has investigated microplastics pollution of waterbodies, but more recently there has been an interest in atmospheric circulation of microplastics, perhaps fuelled by a greater understanding of their sources, including our clothes.
Microplastics are defined as being between 1 micrometre (µm) and 5mm and despite being inert, can carry a variety of pollutants, toxic substances and pathogens, adhered to their surface and do not meaningfully degrade in water (Kärkkäinen and Sillanpää, 2020) (Zambrano et al., 2019).
Whilst research continues into understanding and reducing microfibre emissions from clothes washing, this project aims to consider microfibre shedding resulting from mechanical drying. Although indoor microfibre pollution is somewhat overlooked, 70-90% of our time is spent indoors (Prata, 2018), making indoor microfibre exposure research highly relevant.
In 2018, around half of UK households owned a tumble dryer, with ownership rising to 70% for a family of two adults and two children (Statista, 2018). A small number of studies have started to look at the emissions associated with domestic tumble dryers, with a 2022 study finding a mixed-textile load of clothes produced between 433,128–561,810 microfibers (Tao et al., 2022). However, there are numerous factors that impact these sorts of results; age and type of dryer, the size of the loads, the types of textiles used for drying, and the length of a cycle. Importantly, most of these studies collected microfibres from a lint filter, rather than those escaping to the indoor atmosphere.
There is also an apparent lack of previous microfibre studies within laundrettes and dry cleaners. This seems a logical place to detect and measure airborne microfibre deposition – a setting where dryers ran potentially all day, several days a week, every month of the year. Laundrettes offer a ‘real-life’ scenario – different mixtures of textiles and treatments, with washing and drying, folding, ironing and even dry cleaning, all within the same space. It provides an excellent opportunity to measure every-day emissions from these businesses. The results could help understand differing sources of microfibres, with both relevance for the home and from industry and may have implications for occupational health.
Two businesses have already agreed to work on the project, with pilot studies currently under way. Both offer laundry and dry-cleaning services together, in quite different settings; one of these is a franchise which operates within a large household supermarket and the other a standalone shop in a busy precinct. Petri dishes have been placed in key locations within their premises. Once collected, the first step will be to analyse any fibres, counting individual fibres and then determining their size, mass and type which is expected to be a mixture of natural and synthetic fibres. It will be interesting to determine which fraction is inhalable. Some adjustments to the methodology are expected, but it is hoped that the main study will be concluded by the end of the year.
References
Browne, M. A., Crump, P., Niven, S. J., Teuten, E., Tonkin, A., Galloway, T., & Thompson, R. (2011) Accumulation of Microplastic on Shorelines Worldwide: Sources and Sinks. Environmental Science & Technology [online]. 45 (21), pp. 9175–9179 [Accessed 3 April 2024].
Kärkkäinen N, Sillanpää M. (2020) Quantification of different microplastic fibres discharged from textiles in machine wash and tumble drying. Environ Science Pollution Research International [online]. 28 (13) pp., 16253-16263. [Accessed 6 February 2024].
Liu, J., Liang, J., Ding, J., Zhang, G., Zeng, X., Yang, Q. (2021) Microfiber pollution: an ongoing major environmental issue related to the sustainable development of textile and clothing industry. Environment, Development and Sustainability [online]. 23, pp. 11240–11256. [Accessed 4 March 2024].
Prata, J.C. (2018) Airborne microplastics: Consequences to human health? Environmental pollution [Online] 234, pp. 115–126 . [Accessed 24 February 2024].
Statista (2018) Distribution of tumble dryers in the UK by household composition. Available from https://www.statista.com/statistics/289321/distribution-of-tumble-dryers-in-the-uk-by-household-composition/ [Accessed 30 May 2024]
Tao, D., Zhang, K., Xu, S., Lin, H., Liu, Y., Kang, J., Yim, T., Giesy, J.P., & Leung, K. M. Y. (2022). Microfibers Released into the Air from a Household Tumble Dryer. Environmental Science & Technology Letters [online]. 9 (2), pp. 120–126. [Accessed 12 March 2024].
Zambrano, M.C., Pawlak, J.J., Daystar, J., Ankeny, M., Goller, C.C., & Venditti, R. A. (2020). Aerobic biodegradation in freshwater and marine environments of textile microfibers generated in clothes laundering: Effects of cellulose and polyester-based microfibers on the microbiome. Marine Pollution Bulletin [online]. 151,pp. 110826–110826. [Accessed 10 April 2024].





